The research aims at demonstrating the negative relationship between overinvestment and performance.
The dataset from Thomson Reuters covers 669 Vietnamese non-financial listed companies from 2013 to
2017. With the use of Fixed Effects Model in both Investment Demand Function and main econometric
model, the paper indicates that overinvestment, the cause leading to ineffective operations in corporate
businesses, tends to worsen firm performance. Nevertheless, such a negative effect could be restrained
with the intervention of the government through state ownership. Interestingly, the regulating role of state
ownership will only be stronger in companies with the state ownership rate lower than 50%.
13 trang |
Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Ngày: 19/05/2022 | Lượt xem: 316 | Lượt tải: 0
Nội dung tài liệu The role of state ownership in regulating the effect of overinvestment on performance, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American
economic review, 1986. 76(2): p. 323-329.
[6] Bos, D., Privatization: a theoretical treatment. OUP Catalogue, 1991.
[7] Boycko, M., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny, A theory of privatisation. The Economic Journal, 1996:
p. 309-319.
[8] Krueger, A.O., The political economy of controls: American sugar. 1988, National Bureau of
Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
[9] Dewenter, K.L. and P.H. Malatesta, State-owned and privately owned firms: An empirical analysis
of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity. American Economic Review, 2001. 91(1): p. 320-334.
[10] Gaver, J.J. and K.M. Gaver, Additional evidence on the association between the investment
opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of
Accounting and economics, 1993. 16(1-3): p. 125-160.
[11] Hodrick, R.J. and E.C. Prescott, Postwar US business cycles: an empirical investigation. Journal of
Money, credit, and Banking, 1997: p. 1-16.
[12] Grazzi, M., N. Jacoby, and T. Treibich, Dynamics of Investment and Firm Performance:
Comparative evidence from manufacturing industries. Empirical Economics, 2016. 51(1): p. 125-
179.
[13] Licandro, O., R. Maroto, and L.A. Puch, Innovation, investment and productivity: evidence from
Spanish firms. 2004.
[14] Nilsen, Ø.A., et al., Lumpy investments, factor adjustments, and labour productivity. Oxford
Economic Papers, 2008. 61(1): p. 104-127.
[15] Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and
ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 1976. 3(4): p. 305-360.
[16] Brealey, R. and J. Franks, Indexation, investment, and utility prices. Oxford review of economic
policy, 2009. 25(3): p. 435-450.
249
[17] Guariglia, A. and J. Yang, A balancing act: managing financial constraints and agency costs to
minimize investment inefficiency in the Chinese market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2016. 36: p.
111-130.
[18] Farooq, S., S. Ahmed, and K. Saleem, Impact of Overinvestment & Underinvestment on Corporate
Performance: Evidence from Singapore Stock Market. 2014.
[19] Liu, N. and D. Bredin, Institutional Investors, Over-investment and Corporate Performance.
University College Dublin, 2010.
[20] Titman, S., K.J. Wei, and F. Xie, Capital investments and stock returns. Journal of financial and
Quantitative Analysis, 2004. 39(4): p. 677-700.
[21] Yang, W., Corporate investment and value creation. Indiana University Bloomington, 2005.
[22] Fan, J.P., T.J. Wong, and T. Zhang, Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-
IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of financial economics, 2007.
84(2): p. 330-357.
[23] Hellman, J.S., G. Jones, and D. Kaufmann, Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption
and influence in transition. 2000.
[24] La Porta, R., et al., Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The journal of
finance, 2000. 55(1): p. 1-33.
[25] Shleifer, A. and R.W. Vishny, Politicians and firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994.
109(4): p. 995-1025.
[26] La Porta, R., et al., Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of financial economics,
2000. 58(1): p. 3-27.
[27] Boubakri, N., J.-C. Cosset, and W. Saffar, Political connections of newly privatized firms. Journal
of corporate finance, 2008. 14(5): p. 654-673.
[28] Megginson, W.L. and J.M. Netter, From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on
privatization. Journal of economic literature, 2001. 39(2): p. 321-389.
[29] Guedhami, O., J.A. Pittman, and W. Saffar, Auditor choice in privatized firms: Empirical evidence
on the role of state and foreign owners. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2009. 48(2-3): p.
151-171.
[30] Denis, D.K. and J.J. McConnell, International corporate governance. Journal of financial and
quantitative analysis, 2003. 38(1): p. 1-36.
[31] Boubakri, N. and J.C. Cosset, The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms:
Evidence from developing countries. The Journal of Finance, 1998. 53(3): p. 1081-1110.
[32] D'souza, J. and W.L. Megginson, The financial and operating performance of privatized firms
during the 1990s. The Journal of Finance, 1999. 54(4): p. 1397-1438.
[33] Faccio, M., Politically connected firms. American economic review, 2006. 96(1): p. 369-386.
[34] Sun, Q., W.H. Tong, and J. Tong, How does government ownership affect firm performance?
Evidence from China’s privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2002.
29(1‐2): p. 1-27.
250
[35] Lu, X., Booty socialism, bureau-preneurs, and the state in transition: Organizational corruption in
China. Comparative Politics, 2000: p. 273-294.
[36] Bokpin, G.A. and J.M. Onumah, An empirical analysis of the determinants of corporate investment
decisions: Evidence from emerging market firms. International Research Journal of Finance and
Economics, 2009. 33: p. 134-141.
[37] Carpenter, R.E. and A. Guariglia, Cash flow, investment, and investment opportunities: New tests
using UK panel data. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2008. 32(9): p. 1894-1906.
[38] Connelly, J.T., Investment policy at family firms: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Economics
and Business, 2016. 83: p. 91-122.
[39] Li, D. and L. Zhang, Does q-theory with investment frictions explain anomalies in the cross section
of returns? Journal of Financial Economics, 2010. 98(2): p. 297-314.
[40] Malm, J., et al., Litigation risk and investment policy. Journal of Economics and Finance, 2016: p.
1-12.
[41] Nair, P., Financial Liberalization and Determinants of Investment: A Study of Indian
Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Management of International Business and
Economic Systems, 2011. 5(1): p. 121-133.
[42] Ruiz-Porras, A. and C. Lopez-Mateo, Corporate governance, market competition and investment
decisions in Mexican manufacturing firms. 2011.
[43] Richardson, S., Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of accounting studies, 2006. 11(2-3): p.
159-189.
[44] He, W. and N.A. Kyaw, Ownership structure and investment decisions of Chinese SOEs. Research
in International Business and Finance, 2018. 43: p. 48-57.
[45] Chen, Y.-C., M. Hung, and Y. Wang, The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability
and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2017.
[46] Altaf, N. and F. Shah, Working capital management, firm performance and financial constraints:
Empirical evidence from India. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2017. 9(3): p. 206-
219.
[47] Fosu, S., Capital structure, product market competition and firm performance: Evidence from South
Africa. The quarterly review of economics and finance, 2013. 53(2): p. 140-151.
[48] Adhikari, A., C. Derashid, and H. Zhang, Public policy, political connections, and effective tax
rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 2006. 25(5):
p. 574-595.
[49] Claessens, S., E. Feijen, and L. Laeven, Political connections and preferential access to finance:
The role of campaign contributions. Journal of financial economics, 2008. 88(3): p. 554-580.
[50] Johnson, S. and T. Mitton, Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of
financial economics, 2003. 67(2): p. 351-382.
251
APPENDIXES
Table A1. Variable Measurement for main econometric model
, 0 1 , 2 , 3 ,
4, 0 , 5 , 6 ,
7 , ,, 8 90
i t i t i t i t
i t i t i t
i
i t
i t t i t
Performance Dividend Leverage AssetGrowth
ProfitVolatility Liquidity Tangibility
Overinvestment SOErate Overinves
Performance
Performanc m ne t e t
, ,
50%
10 , , ,, ,0
.i t i t
i t i t i t ti t i
SOErate
Overinvestment SOEratePerformance SOE
Dependent Variables
Variables Denote Definition
Firm Performance
EBIT/TA EBIT (Earnings Before Interest & Tax) divided by Total Asset
EBT/TA EBT (Earnings Before Tax) divided by Total Asset
EAT/TA EAT (Earnings After Tax) divided by Total Asset
Explanatory Variables
Variables Denote Definition
Profit volatility ,i tMROA
Moving average of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization) over Total Asset ratios in
three consecutive years
Company Growth ,i t
AssetGrowth
Growth rates of total assets
Dividend ,i tDividend Cash dividend payments
Leverage ,i tLeverage Total liabilities over total assets
Liquidity ,i tLiquidity The ratio of short-term assets to short-term debt
Tangibility ,i tTangibility
The sum of fixed assets, real estates, and inventory divided by
total assets
Overinvestment
,i tOverinvestment
The error terms of Equation (1) with ,ˆ 0i t
State ownership rate ,i tSOErate State ownership rates
SOE dummy
50%
,i tSOE
Dummy variable equal 1 if SOE rates < 50%
252
Table A2. Variable Measurement for sub equation
, 0 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ,
5 , 6 , 7, 0 , ,
i t i t i t i t i t
i t i t it ti t i
NewInvestment CashFlow TobinQ FixCapitalIntensity FirmSize
RevenueGrowth BusinessRisk LeverageNewInvestment
Dependent Variables
Variables Denote Definition
New Investment ,i tNewInvestment
Total investment including long-term and short-term
investment divided by total asset
Explanatory Variables
Variables Denote Definition
Cash Flow ,i tCashFlow
The cash available in a company after subtracting
capital expenditures
Market Performance ,i tTobinQ
The Q ratio is calculated as the market value of a
company divided by the firm's assets
Fix Capital Intensity ,i t
FixCapitalIntensity
The ability to generate fixed assets through sales
measured by total fix asset divided by total sales
Firm Growth ,i tRevenueGrowth The growth rate of firm's revenue over year
Firm Size ,i tFirmSize Natural logarithm of total asset
Business Risk ,i tBusinessRisk
Standard deviation of EBITDA (Earnings Before
Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) over
Total Asset ratio in three consecutive years
Leverage ,i tLeverage Total liabilities over total asset
All the above variables are calculated by using financial data from Thomson Reuters Eikon Financial
Analysis
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- the_role_of_state_ownership_in_regulating_the_effect_of_over.pdf