During the Covid-19 pandemic, the use of technology has been a primary tool to conduct teaching
and learning activities. Therefore, there has been a great interest in exploring practical teaching
frameworks or teaching models of online learning and blended learning. In this literature reviewbased study, I would like to bring up the flipped classroom as a novel and innovative model in
language teaching. With a systematic approach employing statistical methods, the study looks into
the terminology and its history and then carries out a literature review of the research works on
the flipped classroom in teaching in general and in language teaching in particular. The study also
strives to reveal the situation of research on flipped foreign language classrooms in Vietnam.
              
                                            
                                
            
 
            
                 7 trang
7 trang | 
Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Lượt xem: 553 | Lượt tải: 0 
              
            Nội dung tài liệu The flipped foreign language classroom model: A literature review, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
1 
THE FLIPPED FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM MODEL: 
A LITERATURE REVIEW 
Kiều Huyền Trâm, M.A 
ABSTRACT 
During the Covid-19 pandemic, the use of technology has been a primary tool to conduct teaching 
and learning activities. Therefore, there has been a great interest in exploring practical teaching 
frameworks or teaching models of online learning and blended learning. In this literature review-
based study, I would like to bring up the flipped classroom as a novel and innovative model in 
language teaching. With a systematic approach employing statistical methods, the study looks into 
the terminology and its history and then carries out a literature review of the research works on 
the flipped classroom in teaching in general and in language teaching in particular. The study also 
strives to reveal the situation of research on flipped foreign language classrooms in Vietnam. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
1.1. Rationale of the study 
Most teachers and students will possibly be of the same mind that class time is too short to complete 
the full lesson plan and that a large portion of each lesson is teacher-centered due to the large 
amount of content that has to be conveyed. Meanwhile, for language teaching in particular, it is 
generally agreed that student-centered activities should be the primary focus of class time. In 
Vietnam, from my own experience, most English classes are very teacher-dominated and thus, 
students do not have enough opportunities to drill, practice or hone their language skills as well as 
to get feedback from their teachers. After their English classes, students may then go home thinking 
that they have acquired quite a few new words or have grasped the use of the past tense, for 
instance, but they may later find out that it is impossible for them to use the newly learned words 
or apply the grammatical rules for their communication without being exposed to them a number 
of more times. Moreover, even when students take time to revise and reinforce the takeaway from 
their classes, they may be confused sometimes when doing homework or have some doubts about 
their application of what they have learned. At this point, their English teachers are not available 
to give answers to their questions. As a teacher in the field, I am deeply interested in the application 
of emerging technologies to teach languages more effectively so that my students would have more 
time practicing in class and at the same time, I, as their teacher, can provide better help. I am 
especially intrigued by the flipped classroom model, which has been extensively used by many 
educators all over the world and proven by a large volume of studies to be an effective and efficient 
alternative to a traditional classroom. 
However, the implementation as well as the research of flipped learning in Vietnam, especially in 
the field of teaching English as a foreign language, is still in its infancy. Therefore, this study 
attempts to do a literature review research on this model in the hope of contributing to its popularity 
in English classes in Vietnam. 
In addition, under the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, technology is being used as a primary 
tool to conduct teaching and learning throughout the world. Vietnam’s education is not excluded 
from that mainstream. Never before in Vietnam has there been such a great interest in e-learning 
modes, online learning platforms, and blended learning. Both Vietnamese teachers and their 
students are now prepared to use technology and ready to switch to new modes of teaching and 
learning different from the traditional ones. As a teacher and a researcher, I believe it is the right 
2 
time for such an innovative model as a flipped class to be employed in the setting of the Vietnamese 
language classroom. 
1.2. Objectives of the study 
This study tries to achieve the following objectives: 
- To investigate the term “flipped classroom” and how it works practically 
- To deliver a literature review of research on the flipped classroom in general and research on the 
flipped foreign language classroom in particular. 
 1.3. Research focus 
In my research, I will be focusing on the following: the flipped classroom model, especially the 
use of the model in foreign language teaching for post-secondary students. 
1.4. Significance of study 
This study will hopefully provide instructors some insight into the flipped classroom. Language 
teachers, especially those who teach in Vietnam, could take the findings of the study into 
consideration when it comes to whether or not to use flipped classroom model in their teaching. 
Additionally, my study will also strive to draw the attention of policy-makers to the importance of 
utilizing flipped classrooms in the future. 
1.5. Methodology 
The study is done with a systematic approach using statistical methods in order to integrate the 
results of the included studies. By this way, I investigated different studies, combined them and 
then weighed and compared them to identify similarities, disagreements, or relationships among 
them. 
2. RESULTS 
2.1. The flipped classroom 
What is the flipped classroom? 
The flipped classroom (‘flipping the classroom’, ‘flipped learning’ or ‘inverted classroom’) is a 
new terminology in education but not a completely brand new idea. It can be considered a type of 
blended learning in which the traditional learning process is reversed. It moves instructional 
content, which has traditionally taken place in the classroom, outside of the classroom and moves 
activities that have traditionally been homework into the classroom. Bergmann & Sams (2012) 
states that flipped learning approach can increase the time for students to use English inside and 
outside the classroom. As defined by Bishop and Verleger (2013), this learning model is a 
pedagogy including “the direct computer-based individual instruction outside the classroom” and 
“the interactive group learning activities inside the classroom”. However, flipped materials are not 
always tied to technology (Brinks Lockwood, 2014). Students are exposed to instructional content 
via videos or online platforms, etc. but they can do the readings and worksheets provided by 
teachers prior to class. Therefore, using flipped classroom model, teachers can free up class time 
for students to do more active tasks in order to assimilate, integrate, practice, and expand upon 
what they have learned. In other words, the flipped classroom encourages learner autonomy and 
allows students to do ‘homework’ in class in a very cooperative way. “Interaction and discussion 
among students and between students and teachers are conducive to the success of the flipped 
method.” (Kouloumbaritsi, Dimitroglou, Mavrikaki & Galanopoulou, 2013) 
The history of flipped classrooms 
3 
The flipped classroom concept was originally described in 2000 by J. Wesley Baker in a conference 
when he talked about the availability of his lecture notes online as a strategy for maximizing time 
for group work in class (Baker, J. Wesley, 2000). However, Aaron Sams and Jonathan Bergmann 
are often quoted as the pioneers of the flipped class movement. In 2007, they began to “flip” their 
chemistry class when they started to record lessons for students who missed some classes. Then 
they discovered that the videos also worked well for those who had attended the classes and wanted 
to review the lessons. They noted that their students were more engaged and interacted more in 
class. This allowed the teachers to be more focused on students who were most in need of their 
assistance. In 2012, Aaron Sams and Jonathan Bergmann launched the ‘Flipped Classroom 
Network’ (flippedclassroom.org). By 2014, the website’s membership had grown to over 20,000. 
The network’s mission is to help teachers all over the world to implement the flipped classroom 
model. 
The theoretical framework for the flipped classroom model 
The flipped classroom draws on Bloom’s taxonomy of knowledge and social constructivism as its 
fundamental theoretical framework. William, Beth (2013) did a great job of comparing two class 
models, traditional and flipped, in relationship to Bloom’s taxonomy. 
Figure 1: Blooms Taxonomy 
Image source: 
classroom/ 
Original source: William, Beth (2013) 
The flipped classroom model is also thought to derive from Kolb’s experiential learning theory, 
but it is brought up to date with the application of new technologies. Kolb (1984) claims that the 
nature of learning is experiential and thus, the traditional classroom only makes a small 
contribution to the learning experience. Kolb's theory can be represented by the illustration below 
that depicts a learning cycle of four stages that learners need to go through in order to fully grasp 
the contents of a lesson. 
4 
Figure 2: The 4-Stage Learning Cycle by Kolb (1984) 
Image source: https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html 
Original source: McLeod, S., (updated 2017). Kolb – Learning styles 
In a flipped classroom, students experience content outside the classroom, via assigned materials 
such as videos or reading material. This is the first stage in the Kolb cycle, exposure to new 
knowledge. Interestingly, doing or having an experience is a basic cognitive function low on 
Bloom’s taxonomy and can be easily done by most students. That is followed by a reflective 
process which is normally done outside of class time as ‘homework’ in the traditional classroom 
model. However, in the flipped class, the teacher can guide the reflective process during class time 
by organising activities that involve collaboration (Bishop & Verleger, 2013). The students then 
go through the abstract and experimentation stages under the teacher’s guidance, participating in 
active learning, cooperative learning, and problem-solving. 
2.2. Literature review of studies on the flipped classroom 
Research on the flipped classroom 
Many studies have been done to illuminate the impact of the flipped model on teaching and learning 
content-based subjects. Some of them indicate that flipped instruction really has a positive effect. 
An architecture class flipped by Zappe (2009) and a college prep chemistry class flipped by 
Ruddick (2012) both show that students have a strong preference for flipped class more than 
traditional class. Nevertheless, not all findings of the research on flipped classroom are 
substantially positive. Umam et al (2019) conclude that adopting the model in teaching 
mathematics really pushes students’ learning autonomy and in-class engagement, but there are 
challenges that teachers have to tackle like technical issues, weaknesses in editing and recording 
skills and time constraints. Conducting a flipped introductory statistics class at college, Strayer 
(2007) makes a contrast between a traditional classroom and a flipped classroom. The findings 
from his qualitative data (audio from classroom sessions, interviews, field notes, reflective 
journals, etc.) then point out that students, at the early stage, were not as interested in the flipped 
classroom as the regular class. However, they gradually developed their enthusiasm for this new 
model. Thus, Strayer suggests that there should be a transition between the traditional and flipped 
classroom. Noticeably, 45% of 148 students who have participated in some flipped classes held by 
the library at Townson University respond that they prefer traditional to the flipped classroom but 
very few respondents explain or clarify their choices on the post-class survey (Arnold-Gaza, 2014). 
5 
In a nutshell, despite the fact that there has been an abundance of research work on the flipped 
classroom model, the results are inconclusive. As Strayer (2012) said, more studies on this learning 
model framework will identify the effectiveness of flipped classroom 
Research on the flipped foreign language classroom 
In foreign language teaching, the flipped classroom model is a new and innovative step from the 
Computer Assisted Language Learning approach (CALL) and has become popular only in recent 
years (Loucky & Ware, 2017). Many educators argue that, “foreign language teachers can get the 
most mileage out of flipped classrooms” (Strawbridge, 2017) because the flipped learning 
maximizes class time for students to communicate in the target language. Consequently, the speed 
of popularizing the model has been considerably faster for foreign language classes than for most 
other kinds of classes. However, very few flipped classroom learning studies have been conducted 
with a focus on foreign language teaching contexts (Basal, 2015). 
Through the literature review, I found out that most of the studies on flipped learning in foreign 
language classrooms focus on exploring differences in terms of academic performance between a 
flipped class and a traditional class. Hung (2015) studies three groups of 75 Taiwanese freshmen 
majoring in English: full-flipped group, semi-flipped group and non-flipped group. Her findings 
then show that those of the first two groups perform better than the students in the non-flipped one. 
In Kang’s (2015) study, 24 ESL students are ‘intervened’ by flipped model. Before each class, they 
are assigned pre-preparation tasks, including grammar videos and worksheets. Pre and post-test are 
used to measure the efficiency of grammar and vocabulary, while questionnaires and interviews 
are instruments of collecting the students’ perceptions towards the model. Even though there is no 
significant disparity between the results of the flipped model and the regular classroom, the 
respondents of the study claim that the new learning model really maximizes interaction among 
students and between students and teachers and enhances achievement of learning goals. 
Teachers’ perceptions of flipped classrooms have also been investigated in some studies of which 
Basal’s (2015) study is probably the most noticeable. The study is divided into two phases: the 
preliminary phase deals with recognizing problems concerning the implementation of flipped 
classes; the second phase collects opinions of the participants through questionnaires and open-
ended interviews. Basal (2015) then puts an emphasis on teachers’ role “other than technical issues, 
the success of a flipped learning model depends on the teacher applying it” (p.34). 
Meanwhile, research on the flipped foreign language classroom in Vietnam is very limited. Tran 
(2016) chooses the students majoring in Accounting as participants in his case study of using the 
flipped model. He collaborates with some colleagues in Ho Chi Minh city to build up interactive 
internet-based lessons for students to watch before class. He concludes that his students are highly 
interested in this new learning model and suggests considering replacing the regular classes with 
the flipped ones. Contributing to the literature review of applying flipped classrooms in teaching 
English in Vietnam, Huynh & Nguyen (2019) implemented a 10-week flipped interpretation course 
for 37 English-majored undergraduates. The students are requested to read the assigned chapters, 
watch videotaped lectures, access suggested supplemented online materials, and then engage in the 
discussion forum. During class time, they are supposed to actively take part in student-centered 
activities. The results of their study reveal that flipped instruction engenders positive perceptions 
from students. Huynh & Nguyen (2019) especially appreciate Moodle as an effective platform for 
conducting flipped courses. 
6 
3. CONCLUSION 
As seen from the literature review above, in general, flipped classroom reveals some prominent 
advantages worth considering. However, the following questions: should traditional classroom be 
replaced with flipped classroom? And, in what contexts should flipped classrooms be used? Are 
still controversial. In addition, there is still a big gap of research on foreign language flipped 
classrooms in the world, especially in Vietnam, that needs to fill in. Specifically, there is little 
research investigating the process of implementing a flipped class and the perceptions of both 
teachers and students toward this model. Therefore, there is a need to conduct more studies on 
those research areas in order to provide language teachers more insights into the model. 
References 
Arnold-Gara. (2014). The flipped Classroom. College & Research Libraries News 75, no.1; 10-13 
Baker, J. Wesley. (2000). The Classroom Flip: Becoming the Guide by the Side. Communication 
Faculty Presentations. 11. Retrieved from 
https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/media_and_applied_communications_presentations/11 
Basal, A. (2015). The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. Turkish 
Online Journal of Distance Education, 16, 28-37 
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every 
day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. 
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. Paper 
presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta. 
Brinks Lockwood, R (2014). Flip it! Strategies for the ESL classroom. Ann Arbor: University of 
Michigan Press. 
Burns, A. (2005). Action research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.). Handbook of research in second language 
teaching and learning (pp. 241-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods 
approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. 
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced 
nursing, 62, 107-115. Retrieved from 
Field, J. (1997). Key concepts in ELT: Classroom research. English Language Teaching Journal, 
51(2), 192-193. 
Hung, H.-T. (2017). The integration of a student response system in flipped classrooms. Language 
Learning & Technology, 21(1), 16–27. Retrieved from 
Huynh, T. & Nguyen, U. (2019). Students’ Perceptions & Design Considerations of Flipped 
Interpreting Classroom. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 9(9), 1100-1110. Retrieved from 
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0909.05 
Kang, N. (2015). The Comparison between Regular and Flipped Classrooms for EFL Korean Adult 
Learners. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 18, 41-72. 
Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2005) Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and 
the Public Sphere. In: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y., Eds., The Sage Handbook of Qualitative 
Research, 3rd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 559-603. 
7 
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. 
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 
Kouloumbaritsi, Dimitroglou, Mavrikaki & Galanopoulou. (2013). Action Research on Using 
Flipped Classroom Principles to Teach Upper High School Biology. Paper presented at 7th 
International Conference in Open & Distance Learning - November 2013, Athens, Greece . 
Loucky, J. P., & Ware, J. L. (2017). Flipped Instruction Methods and Digital Technologies in the 
Language Classroom. United States: IGI Global. 
McLeod, S., (updated 2017). Kolb – Learning styles. Retrieved from 
https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html 
Richards, J.C., & Farrell, T.S.C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: 
Strategies for teacher learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. 
Riding, Phil, Fowell, Sue and Levy, Phil (1995) "An action research approach to curriculum 
development". Information Research, 1(1). Retrieved from 
1/paper2.html 
Roller, M. R., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied qualitative research design: A total quality 
framework approach. The Guilford Press. 
Ruddick, K.W. 2012. Improving Chemical education from High School to College Using a more 
Hands-On Approach. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Memphis. 
Strawbridge, J. (2017). 5 basics you need to achieve a flipped language classroom. Retrieved from 
https://www.fluentu.com/blog/educator/flipped-language-classroom/ 
Strayer, J. F. (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison 
of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring 
system. Dissertation, The Ohio State University. 
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How Learning in an Inverted Classroom Influences Cooperation, Innovation 
and Task Orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171-193. Retrieved from 
Umam, K., Nusantara, T., & Mulyono, H. (2019). An application of flipped classroom in 
mathematics teacher education programme. International Journal of Interactive Mobile 
Technologies, 13(3), 68-80. 
Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2005). Research methods in education. USA: Pearson 
William, Beth (2013). How I flipped my classroom. NNNC Conference, Norfolk, NE 
Zappe, S. E., Leicht, R., Messner, J., & Litzinger, T. (2009). “Flipping” the Classroom to Explore 
Active Learning in a Large Undergraduate Course. Paper presented at the annual conference of 
the American Society for Engineering Education, Austin, TX. 
            Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
 the_flipped_foreign_language_classroom_model_a_literature_re.pdf the_flipped_foreign_language_classroom_model_a_literature_re.pdf