Impact of dividend policy on corporate value: Experiment in Vietnam

The paper examines the impact of dividend policy on corporate value. Data collection is the result

of listed companies on the Vietnamese stock market in the period of 2006 - 2017 with 2,278

observations. Using the General Least Square (GLS) approach, the authors have identified three

factors that have a positive and significant impact on corporate value: dividend payout,

profitability, and corporate sizes; and one factor which has a negative impact on corporate value is

the degree of financial leverage. The study found that dividend policy has a significant impact on

the corporate value of companies that implement a higher dividend payout policy. Conversely,

firms that do not pay dividends or pay low dividends do not experience a significant impact of

dividend policy on corporate value. The results of the study will be meaningful for businesses on

dividend policy implementation.

pdf15 trang | Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Ngày: 24/05/2022 | Lượt xem: 430 | Lượt tải: 0download
Nội dung tài liệu Impact of dividend policy on corporate value: Experiment in Vietnam, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
t to firm’s value when measured by Tobin's Q and share price. The results of this study are consistent with the findings of Allayannis & Weston (2001), Mohamad & Saad (2010), Hung, Ha, & Binh (2018). • Enterprise Size factor (SIZE): is positively correlated and statistically significant to firm’s value when measured by Tobin's Q and stock price. The results of this study are in line with the original H3 hypothesis, which is consistent with the study results of Colquitt et al. (1999), Liebenberg & Hoyt (2003), Dang, Tran, Nguyen (2018), but contrary to the study of Lang & Stulz (1994), Allayannis & Weston (2001), Dogan & Topal (2014), Anton (2016). • Degree of Financial Leverage factor (DFL): is inversely related to business value and is statistically significant in all models when measuring firm’s value using Tobin's Q and stock price. The results of this study are in line with the original H4 hypothesis, which is consistent with the results of Durand (1952), Modigliani & Miller 642 (1958), Modigliani & Miller (1963), but not similar to the results of the study Hoyt & Liebenberg (2011), Anton (2016). 4. Conclusions and Policy Implications The cash dividend payment of listed companies on Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange was less volatile and tended to decrease during the study period. Dividend policy is measured by the ratio of cash dividends, which has a positive impact on the value of enterprises and the statistical significance at 1%. Businesses need to maintain stability and dividend policy with a high dividend payout ratio (over 10% per year) because this is a very important factor affecting the value of the business. Also, there is a positive correlation between profitability and business value. This shows a consensus over the theories set forth above. Thus, enterprises need to improve their profitability by saving money, effectively using existing equipment; at the same time, to expand the size, maintaining the growth rate as they are factors that help increase the corporate value. Enterprises should expand the form of joint ventures with partners both at home country and abroad to acquire more assets, especially fixed assets with modern technology to operate as well as learn to improve management levels, utilizing assets and markets of partners to enhance corporate value. In addition, businesses need to manage the costs associated with sales and business management as well as manage well receivables in order to improve operational efficiency. Financial leverage influences the value of the business. This means that with corporates that rely on borrowing, the value of the business will be reduced. As the result, businesses need to be cautious in mobilizing loans, giving priority to owners’ equity and stock issuance for business financing. For investors, results of the study on the impact of dividend policy, profitability, business size, financial leverage on the corporate value of listed companies on Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange will show them some practical explanation of those influences. From then, looking at dividend policy, investors will have the ability to predict the profitability of the business in order to make appropriate investment decisions. This paper stops at the study of internal factors affecting business value. In the future, the research team will continue to expand on the study of external factors such as inflation, growth rate, interest rate, etc., as well as further analysis of internal factors such as business management and ownership structure in order to clarify the impact of dividend policy on corporate value. At the same time, the research will expand on the number of surveyed enterprises, and the duration of the survey in the next study in order to give a more complete and quantitative view of the trend and the impact of the factors on the corporate value. 5. References Allayannis, G., & Weston, J. P. (2001). The use of foreign currency derivatives and firm market value. The review of financial studies, 14(1), 243-276. 643 Amidu, M. (2007). How does dividend policy affect performance of the firm on Ghana stock Exchange. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 4(2), 103-112. Anton, S. G. (2016). The impact of dividend policy on firm value. A panel data analysis of romanian listed firms. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, 10, 107-112. Ball, R., Kothari, S., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of accounting and economics, 29(1), 1-51. Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1974). The effects of dividend yield and dividend policy on common stock prices and returns. Journal of financial economics, 1(1), 1-22. Budagaga, A. (2017). Dividend Payment and its Impact on the Value of Firms Listed on Istanbul Stock Exchange: A Residual Income Approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(2), 370-376. Colquitt, L. L., Hoyt, R. E., & Lee, R. B. (1999). Integrated risk management and the role of the risk manager. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 2(3), 43-61. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial management, 23(3), 70-74. Dang, N. H., Tran, M. D., & Nguyen, T. L. A. (2018). INVESTIGATION OF THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON STOCK PRICES: THE CASE OF VIETNAM. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(2), 1-12. Dogan, M., & Topal, Y. (2014). The influence of dividend payments on company performance: The Case of Istanbul Stock Exchange (BIST). European Journal of Business and Management, 3(6), 189-197. Durand, D. (1952). Costs of debt and equity funds for business: trends and problems of measurement. Paper presented at the Conference on research in business finance. Dyl, E. A., & Weigand, R. A. (1998). The information content of dividend initiations: Additional evidence. Financial management, 27(3), 27-35. Gordon, M. J. (1963). Optimal investment and financing policy. The journal of finance, 18(2), 264-272. Gul, S., Sajid, M., Razzaq, N., Farrukh, M., & Khan, M. B. (2012). The Relationship between Dividend Policy and Shareholder's Wealth (Evidence from Pakistan). Economics and Finance Review, 2(2), 55-59. Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The value of enterprise risk management. Journal of risk and insurance, 78(4), 795-822. Hu, F., & Chen, X. (2012). Dividend smoothing and firm value: Evidence from Chinese firms. Paper presented at the Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII), 2012 International Conference on. 644 Hung, D. N., Ha, H. T. V., & Binh, D. T. (2018). Impact of accounting information on financial statements to the stock price of the energy enterprises listed on Vietnam's stock market. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(2), 1-6. Jensen, G. R., Solberg, D. P., & Zorn, T. S. (1992). Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt, and dividend policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 27(2), 247-263. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of financial economics, 58(1), 3-27. La Rocca, M. (2010). Is Ownership a Complement to Debt in Affecting Firm’s Value. A Meta-Analysis. Lang, L. H., & Stulz, R. M. (1994). Tobin's q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. Journal of political economy, 102(6), 1248-1280. Liebenberg, A. P., & Hoyt, R. E. (2003). The determinants of enterprise risk management: Evidence from the appointment of chief risk officers. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 6(1), 37-52. Lin, F.-L. (2010). A panel threshold model of institutional ownership and firm value in Taiwan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 42(1), 54-62. Liow, K. H. (2010). Firm value, growth, profitability and capital structure of listed real estate companies: an international perspective. Journal of Property Research, 27(2), 119-146. Litzenberger, R. H., & Ramaswamy, K. (1979). The effect of personal taxes and dividends on capital asset prices: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of financial economics, 7(2), 163-195. Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411-433. Miller, M. H., & Rock, K. (1985). Dividend policy under asymmetric information. The journal of finance, 40(4), 1031-1051. Miller, M. H., & Scholes, M. S. (1982). Dividends and taxes: Some empirical evidence. Journal of political economy, 90(6), 1118-1141. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American economic review, 48(3), 261-297. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. The American economic review, 433-443. 645 Mohamad, N. E. A. B., & Saad, N. B. M. (2010). Working capital management: The effect of market valuation and profitability in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(11), 140-147. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial economics, 20, 293-315. Mule, R. K., Mukras, M. S., & Nzioka, O. M. (2015). Corporate size, profitability and market value: An econometric panel analysis of listed firms in Kenya. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 11(13), 376-396. Murekefu, & Ouma, O. P. (2012). The relationship between dividend payout and firm performance: a study of listed companies in Kenya. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 8(9), 199-215. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of financial economics, 13(2), 187-221. Nwamaka, O. C., & Ezeabasili. (2017). Effect of Dividend Policies on Firm Value: Evidence from quoted firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Management Excellence, 8(2), 956-967. Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687. Poterba, J. M., & Summers, L. H. (1984). New evidence that taxes affect the valuation of dividends. The journal of finance, 39(5), 1397-1415. Ross, S. A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach. The bell journal of economics, 8(1), 23-40. Rozeff, M. S. (1982). Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. Journal of Financial research, 5(3), 249-259. Wang, P., Yu, J., & Cui, J. (2013). Empirical Research on the Impact of Dividend Policy to Enterprise Value in Chinese Real Estate Listed Companies ICCREM 2013: Construction and Operation in the Context of Sustainability, 815-825.

Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:

  • pdfimpact_of_dividend_policy_on_corporate_value_experiment_in_v.pdf