The recent period has witnessed the remarkable achievements of the Greater Mekong
Sub-region (GMS) countries in their economic development and integration which occurred not
only at the sub-regional but also at the global level. Nonetheless, the outbreak of the global
financial crisis, the fluctuation of oil, food, and other commodity prices, and the slowdown of the
industrialized economies in 2008 and the early 2009 has brought about one of the most difficult
challenges to the GMS economies since the Asian financial crisis of 1997 - 1998. This article will
discuss the impacts of the global financial crisis on the GMS economies and their policy
responses. Although the economic prospective of the GMS depends heavily on the recovery of the
global economy, proper policy measures implemented by the governments in the sub-region will
contribute a large part to stabilize the market and restore growth.
12 trang |
Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Ngày: 11/05/2022 | Lượt xem: 397 | Lượt tải: 0
Nội dung tài liệu Global Financial crisis and responses from the GMS countries, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
); vii) Increasing outstanding debt on
credit guarantee for enterprises (about 17000
billions VND); and viii) Other expenses to
stimulate demand aiming at stopping economic
recession, ensuring social security (7200
billions VND) (Vneconomy.vn, 13/5/2009).
4. The prospective of the GMS economies
and the implication for the GMS economic
cooperation
Because of the lagging impact of the global
recession, the first half of 2009 was a difficult
moment for the GMS economies. The
N.M. Hung / VNU Journal of Science, Economics and Business 25, No. 5E (2009) 29-40 37
prospective of growth for the GMS economies
depended by and large on the external demand
but the forecast of regional and global
economies was dismal. In March 2009, World
Bank reported that the world economy in 2009
would suffer a negative growth of 1.7%, with
contraction occurring in all G3 (US, Euro Area
and Japan) and world trade volume contracting
by 6.1%. However, by the end of Q3, the overall
situation has indicated the light in the end of the
tunnel. Global recession seemed to pass its trough
and showed a positive sign of recovery. This was
the result of the combined global and national
efforts to weather the crisis and stimulate the
growth. Recent IMF report expected a more
vigorous global recovery in the later half of 2009
with the growth rate of 3% in 2010.
The GMS economies have also performed
better since Q3 of 2009. For example, the
Vietnamese economy grew at 5.76% on the y-o-
y basis compared to 3.1% and 4.5% in Q1 and
Q2 respectively. China’s y-o-y economic
growth accelerated to 8.9% in Q3 after
tumbling to 6.1% in Q1 and reaching 7.9% in
Q2 of 2009 (news.xinhuanet.com, 22/10/2009).
The Thai economic growth in the third quarter
expanded 2.3 - 2.5 per cent, compared to the
second quarter but contracted 3.1 - 3.3 percent
y-o-y.
Although the fundamental for recovery has
not been consolidated, improving economic
performance in the GMS has been contributed
by timely and well targeted fiscal and monetary
measures by the governments in the sub-region.
The responses from the GMS economies to the
global recession bear important policy
implications for macroeconomic management
and sub-regional cooperation.
First, like other Asian developing
economies, the GMS economies rely too much
on export and foreign investment as the sources
of growth. There was remarkably synchronized
nature of trade and investment contraction
across countries in the sub-region, and this was
generally consistent with their particular
position within global and regional production
networks. This kind of vulnerability may be
even greater for such economies as Vietnam
and Cambodia which have recently become the
WTO member. Nonetheless, trading with
neighboring economies is still very important
for some countries in the GMS because of their
disadvantageous geographical and political
conditions. Laos, for example, being land-
locked, depends on the intra-regional trade
most, with 45% of its exports going to and 72%
of its imports coming from other GMS
countries. The U.S economic sanction has made
Thailand and China Myanmar’s two largest
trading partners. Geographical proximity also
makes CLMV important trading partners of
Yunnan and Guangxi provinces of China.
Figure 1. GDP Growth of the GMS Economies, 2007 - 2014
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Cambodia
China
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Myanmar
Thailand
Vietnam
Figure 1. GDP growth of the GMS economies, 2007 - 2014.
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, October 2009
N.M. Hung / VNU Journal of Science, Economics and Business 25, No. 5E (2009) 29-40 38
Figure 2. Consumer Price Index of the GMS Economies, 2007 - 2014
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Cambodia
China
Lao People's Democratic
Republic
Myanmar
Thailand
Vietnam
Figure 2. Consumer price index of the GMS economies, 2007 - 2014.
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, October 2009
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Cambodia
China
Lao People's Democratic
Republic
Myanmar
Thailand
Vietnam
Figure 3. Current account deficit of the GMS economies, 2007 - 2014.
Source: International monetary fund, World Economic outlook database, October 2009
Second, there has been congruence yet
synergy in the policy responses as the countries
across the sub-region adopted expansionary
monetary and fiscal measures. In this respect,
these policies were quite useful and necessary
but limited because they have been largely
national, independent, and uncoordinated, given
that the GMS economies are increasingly
interdependent with each other, not only in
trade and investment, but also finance.
Indeed, there has been a “stimulus
pressure” upon smaller countries with limited
budget such as Laos and Cambodia who could
not afford to compete with Thailand and
Vietnam in terms of stimulus package size.
However, fiscal policy stimulus can have a
positive spillover effect on the neighboring
countries through trade. Although this is the
benefit of the smaller economies, this should
not be the condition for “free rider” incentive
which leads to a smaller than desirable fiscal
stimulus. So there is a case for more
coordinated action and further deepening and
integration of financial markets in the GMS to
support the sub-region’s long-term growth.
Financial cooperation will help reduce the sub-
region’s financial risks and increase the sub-
N.M. Hung / VNU Journal of Science, Economics and Business 25, No. 5E (2009) 29-40 39
regional influence in shaping the direction of
the international financial system.
Third, although the risk of defection is
always remaining high in a difficult moment,
the GMS economies have not pursued a kind of
beggar-thy-neighbor policy with an aggressive
move to encourage exports through engineering
currency devaluation and provision of favorable
tax treatment for exports or discourage imports
by raising tariffs to protect domestic industries.
Nonetheless, given a more integrated labor
market in the sub-region, the economic
recession may spur the flow of cross-border
migrant workers, therefore forcing the receiving
country to tighten its employment policy on the
migrant workers.
Fourth, there has been concern over the
long-term effect of fiscal stimulus measures and
the expansionary monetary policy. The GMS
economies need to keep a watchful eye on
medium- to long-term deficits and public debt,
balancing fiscal stimulus with fiscal
sustainability. They must ensure that the right
money reaches the right person or money is
channeled into “bankable” investment projects in
infrastructure and other areas, rather than making
a “round-trip” within the financial system of the
economies. Although some part of fiscal
resources may be directed to stabilizing output
and employment in the short term through support
of consumption and investment, a substantial part
should be directed to laying foundations for long-
term growth through, for instance, building
credible social sector protection systems and
promoting green industries.
Finally, as the response to the global
recession, a number of economists
recommended that Asian developing economies
should look at ways to rebalance growth
(Kawai, 2009a, 2009b). The GMS is no
exception. That means the sub-region must
become a market for its own production. The
ultimate objective of growth rebalance is not to
restore current account balance. Export-led
growth of such market-oriented economies as
those in the GMS may have surplus or deficit.
Rather, rebalancing should focus on rectifying
the bias of the incentive scheme in favor of
particular sectors such as export-oriented
industries. More importantly, rebalancing needs
to remove the impediments to domestic
consumption by increasing the purchasing
power of those in the middle to lower part of
income distribution.
References
[1] ADBI (2008), Conference on the sub-prime
mortgage crisis, Managing capital flows, and the
asian economy.
[2] An Pham Sy (2009), Impact of global financial
crisis on Vietnamese economy and policy
response, Paper at International Workshop
“Global financial crisis and responses from the
GMS countries,” Ha Long, 8/11/2009.
[3] BBC News (2008), Inflation tops China 2008
agenda.
[4] Chanhming Phosy (2009), Measures Taken by the
Lao Government to Tackle Global Financial
Crisis and Its Effects, Paper at International
Workshop “Global financial crisis and responses
from the GMS countries,” Ha Long, 8/11/2009.
[5] Chomthongdi, Jacques-chai (2008), Initial
thoughts on impacts of the global financial crisis
on Thailand and India, Focus on the global south,
Thailand, October 30, 2008.
[6] EIU (12/2008), Country Report Laos December
2008.
[7] Hoang, Nguyen Huy (2009), An analysis of the
policy response to the impact of the global
financial crisis: the case of Cambodia, Paper at
International Workshop “Global financial crisis
and responses from the GMS countries,” Ha Long,
8/11/2009.
[8] Kawai, Masahiro (2009a), Welcome remarks at
the conference on global financial crisis:
Macroeconomic policy issues, ADBI, Tokyo, 28-
29 July 2009.
[9] Kawai, Masahiro (2009b), The global financial
crisis and Asia, Policy Dialogue: European Policy
Centre, Brussels, 19 January 2009, ADBI.
[10] Kuroda, Haruhiko (2009), Asia's recovery from
the global financial crisis-What it takes and what
could ADB do?" Lecture by president Asian
development bank at the institute of Southeast
Asian studies (ISEAS), 22 June 2009, Raffles
Hotel, Singapore.
N.M. Hung / VNU Journal of Science, Economics and Business 25, No. 5E (2009) 29-40 40
[11] Lu Na (2009), Chinese Members in Greater Mekong
Sub-region Actively Responding to the International
Financial Crisis, Paper at International Workshop
“Global financial crisis and responses from the GMS
countries,” Ha Long.
[12] Nag, Rajat M (2009), "Impact of the Financial
Crisis on Asian Developing Economies"
Presentation at the University of Ottawa, 22 April
2009, Ottawa, Canada.
[13] Nidhiprabha, Bhanupong (2009), Macroeconomic
management under the global financial crisis.
[14] Nijathaworn, Bandid (2009), Financial
Developments and the Thai Banking Sector,
Keynote address given at the Third Euromoney
Thailand Investment Forum, Centara Grand
Hotel, Bangkok, June 10th 2009.
[15] Tongurai, Jittima and Kazuo Toritani (2009),
Corners Hypothesis and the Proposals on
Foreign Exchange System for East Asia: A
Perspective from the Incompatible Trinity,
Faculty of Economics, Oita University, Asia-
Pacific Economic and Business History
Conference 2009.
[16] Websites:
rate_(consumer_prices).html
file.html
erest-Rate.aspx?symbol=CNY
_exporting_deflation
01/2009-01-08-
voa6.cfm?CFID=323436453&CFTOKEN=31316
578&jsessionid=6630f41a862f32dc40403b463d2
97c5b5d13
siness/business_30098145.php
stimulus-economy-biz-cx_pm_1109notes.html
03/06/content_10952638.htm
0C6/cong-bo-chi-tiet-ve-goi-kich-cau-8-ty-
usd.htm
&ItemID=64689
10/22/content_12295571.htm
pacific/7278450.stm
www.econ.tu.ac.th.
Hà, Đống Đa, Hà Nội
Trong những năm gần đây, các nền kinh tế thuộc Tiểu vùng sông Mê Kông mở rộng (GMS), bao
gồm Campuchia, Lào, Myanmar, Việt Nam, Thái lan và tỉnh Vân Nam của Trung Quốc, đã đạt được
những tiến bộ đáng kể trong phát triển kinh tế - xã hội và hội nhập quốc tế. Tuy nhiên, cuộc khủng
hoảng tài chính toàn cầu, cùng với những biến động về giá lương thực, dầu mỏ và các mặt hàng chủ
chốt khác đã tạo ra một số những thách thức khó khăn nhất định cho các nền kinh tế của Tiểu vùng.
Bài viết này nghiên cứu tác động của cuộc khủng hoảng tài chính toàn cầu đối với các nền kinh tế
GMS và đối sách của các nền kinh tế này. Mặc dù triển vọng của các nền kinh tế GMS phụ thuộc
nhiều vào sự phục hồi của nền kinh tế thế giới, song các chính sách đúng đắn của các chính phủ trong
Tiểu vùng vẫn đóng vai trò then c
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- global_financial_crisis_and_responses_from_the_gms_countries.pdf