This paper analyzes factors that affect account receivables management and its impact on business
performance of enterprises in Vietnam through a sample of 326 non-financial companies. The
companies are listed on the Hanoi Stock Exchange (HNX) and the Hochiminh Stock Exchange (HOSE)
between 2013 and 2017. The research results show that the new variables introduced into the
model is the provision for bad debts which positively affects accounts receivables. As such, when
the provision for bad debts increases and the profit of the company is reduced, the company shall
intensify the implementation of the commercial credit policy, leading to the increase in both
receivables as well as revenue and profit. In addition, the research shows that there is an optimal
level of revenue for business performance. Specifically, if account receivables accounted for
24.98% of total assets, ROA reached the highest value and receivables accounted for 25.15% of
total assets, the ROE also reached the highest value.
20 trang |
Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Ngày: 24/05/2022 | Lượt xem: 278 | Lượt tải: 0
Nội dung tài liệu Factors affect account receivable management and its impact on business performance of Vietnamese enterprises, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
ness, or the profitability of the asset and the return on equity are
greatest. This contributes to the assumption that Lewellen et al. (1980), in the imperfect
competition market, would incur expenses related to credit assessments and contingency
expenses, thus creating a premise for commercial credit policy affecting the efficiency of
business operations. Thus, granting commercial credit can bring benefits such as increased
revenue, expanded market share, but at the same time cause losses to businesses such as
increased financial costs and opportunity costs. customers do not pay or pay late. If these
costs exceed the benefits, they will reduce the efficiency of business operation. Thus, we can
658
conclude in practice that the relationship between customer receivables and business
performance is inverted-U, there is an optimal level of receivability at which efficiency. The
activity of the business is the greatest. At the low level, when the efficiency of the business
increase and the optimal receivables is reduced, the efficiency of the business will decrease.
Moreover, the deviation from the optimal value reduces the efficiency of the business.
Thus, the implication in our study for researchers and business managers is that
managing commercial credit policies is critical to business operations in order to increase
operational efficiency through the profitability of assets and profitability of equity.
Businesses should strive to ensure the optimum level of customer acquisition to maximize
business performance. For the Vietnamese market, the average customer receivable margin
of the industry is about 25% of the total assets.
However, the limitation of this study is the cases for each industry with different
characteristics and for different sizes of enterprises (large enterprises, small and medium
enterprises) different commercial applications. Therefore, it would be worthwhile to
examine the factors that affect receivables and analyze whether there is a non-linear
relationship between receivables and business performance among different occupations or
types of enterprise sizes.
5. References
Akinlo, O. O. (2011), ‘The effect of working capital on profitability of firms in
Nigeria: Evidence from general method of moments (GMM)’, Asian Journal of Business
and Management Sciences, 1 (2), 130-135.
Bagh, T., Nazir, M. I., Khan, M. A., Khan M. A., Razzaq, S. (2016), ‘The Impact of
Working Capital Management on Firms Financial Performance: Evidence from Pakistan’,
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 1097-1105.
Bougheas, S., Mateut, S. and Mizen, P. (2009), ‘Corporate trade credit and
inventories: new evidence of a trade-off from accounts payable and receivable’, Journal
of Banking and Finance, 33 (2), 300-307.
Cheng, N. S. and Pike, R. (2003), ‘The trade credit decision: evidence of UK
firms’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 419–438.
Claver, E., Molina, J. and Tari, J. (2002), ‘Firm and industry effects on firm profitability:
a Spanish empirical analysis’, European Management Journal, 20 (3), 321-328.
Danielson, M. G. and Scott, J.A. (2004), ‘Bank loan availability and trade credit
demand’, The Financial Review, 39 (4), 579-600.
Deloof, M. (2003), ‘Does Working Capital Management Affect Profitability of
Belgian Firms?’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30 (3-4), 573-587.
659
Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Maksimovic, V. (2001), ‘Firms as Financial
Intermediaries: Evidence From Trade Credit Data’, Working Paper 2696, World Bank
Policy Research.
Doğan, M. (2013), ‘Does Firm Size Affect The Firm Profitability? Evidence from
Turkey’, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(4), 53-59.
Emery, G. W. (1984), ‘A pure financial explanation for trade credit’, Journal of
Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19, 271–285.
Ferris, J. S. (1981), ‘A Transactions Theory of Trade Credit Use’, The Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 96 (2), 243–270.
Fiegenbaum, A. and Karnani, A. (1991), ‘Output Flexibility – A Competitive
Advantage for Small Firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 101-114.
Forghani, M., Shirazipour, M., Hosseini, A. (2013), ‘Impact of working capital
management on firms performance’, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research,
3(7), 943-947.
García-Teruel, P. J. and Martínez-Solano, P. (2007), ‘Short-term debt in Spanish
SMEs’, International Small Business Journal, 25, 579–602.
García-Teruel, P. J. and Martínez-Solano, P. (2010), ‘Determinants of trade credit:
A comparative study of European SMEs’, International Small Business Journal, 28(3),
215–233.
Geroski, P.A., Machin, S.J. and Walters, C.F. (1997), ‘Corporate growth and
profitability’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 45 (2), 171-189.
Gill, A., Biger, N. and Mathur. N (2010), ‘The Relationship Between Working
Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States’, Business and
Economics Journal, 2010,1-9.
Goddard, J., Tavakoli, M. and Wilson, J. O. S. (2005), ‘Determinants of
profitability in European manufacturing and services: evidence from a dynamic panel
model’, Applied Financial Economics, 15, 1269-1282.
Gul , S., Khan, M. B., Rehman, U. R., Khan, M. T, Khan, M. and Khan, W. (2013),
‘Working Capital Management and Performance of SME Sector’, European Journal of
Business and Management, 5(1), 60-68.
Hall, M. and Weiss, L. (1967), ‘Firm Size and Profitability’, The Review of
Economics and Statistics, 49 (3), 319 – 331.
Jensen, M.C. and Murphy, K.J. (1990), ‘Performance pay and top-management
incentives’, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (1), 225-64.
660
Khan, M. A., Tragar, G. A. and Bhutto, N. A. (2012), ‘Determinants of Accounts
Receivable and Accounts Payable: A case of Pakistan Textile Sector, Interdisciplinary
Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 240-251.
Kim, Y. H. and Atkins, J. C. (1978), ‘Evaluating investments in accounts
receivable: a wealth maximising framework’, Journal of Finance, 33, 403–412.
Lazaridis, I. and Tryfonidis, D. (2006), ‘The relationship between working capital
management and profitability of listed companies in the Athens Stock Exchange’,
Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, 19 (1), 1-12.
Lee, J. (2009), ‘Does Size Matter in Firm Performance? Evidence from US Public
Firms’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 16 (2), 189-203.
Lewellen, W. G., McConnell, J. J. and Scott, J. A. (1980), ‘Capital market
influences on trade credit policies’, Journal of Financial Research, 2, 105–113.
Long, M. S., Malitz, I. B. and Ravid, S. A. (1993), ‘Trade credit, quality
guarantees, and product marketability’, Financial Management, 22, 117–127.
Makori, D. M. and Jagongo, A. (2013), ‘Working Capital Management and Firm
Profitability : Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing and Construction Firms Listed on Nairobi
S ecurities Exchange, Kenya’, International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 1 (1), 1-14.
Mansoori, E. and Muhammad, D. (2012), ‘The Effect of Working Capital
Management on Firm’s Profitability: Evidence from Singapore’, Interdisciplinary
Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, số 4(5), tr. 472-486.
Martínez-Sola, C., García-Teruel, P. J. and Martínez-Solano, P. (2012), ‘Trade
creditpolicy and firm value’, Accounting & Finance, 53, 791-808
Mian, S. and Smith, C. (1992), ‘Accounts receivables management policy: theory
and evidence’, Journal of Finance, 47, 167–200.
Nadiri, M. I. (1969), ‘The determinants of trade credit in the US total
manufacturing sector’, Econometrica, 37 (3), 408-423.
Ng, C. K., Smith, J. K. and Smith, R. L. (1999), ‘Evidence on the determinants of
credit terms used in interfirm trade’, Journal of Finance, 54, 1109–1129.
Niskanen, J. and Niskanen, M. (2006), ‘The determinants of corporate trade credit
policies in a bank-dominated financial environment: the case of Finnish small firms’,
European Financial Management, 12, 81–102.
Padachi, K. (2006), ‘Trends in Working Capital Management and its Impact on
Firms’Performance: An Analysis of Mauritian Small Manufacturing Firms’,
International Review of Business Research Papers, 2 (2), 45-58.
Petersen, M.A. and Rajan, R.G. (1997), ‘Trade credit: theory and evidence’,
Society for Financial Studies, 10(3), 661-691.
661
Pi, L. and Timme, S. (1993), ‘Corporate control and bank efficiency’, Journal of
Banking and Finance, 17 (2-3), 515-30.
Pike, R., Cheng, N. S., Cravens, K. and Lamminmaki, D. (2005), ‘Trade credits
terms: asymmetric information and price discrimination evidence from three continents’,
Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 32, 1197–1236.
Samiloglu, F. and Demirgunes, K. (2008), ‘The effect of working capital
management on firm profitability: evidence from Turkey’, The International Journal of
Applied Economics and Finance, 2(1), 44-50.
Schwartz, R. (1974), ‘An economic model of trade credit’, Journal of Finance and
Quantitative Analysis, 9, 643–657.
Serrasqueiro, Z.S. and Nunes, P.M. (2008), ‘Performance And Size: Empirical
Evidence From Portuguese SMEs’, Small Business Economics, 31 (2), 195 – 217.
Sharma, A.K., and Kumar, S. (2011), ‘Effect of working capital management on firm
profitability: Empirical evidence from India’, Global Business Review, 12 (1), 159-173.
Shepherd, W.G. (1972), ‘The Elements of Market Structure’, The Review of
Economics and Statistics, 54 (1), 25-37.
Shi, Y., Zhu, C. and Yang, T. (2016), ‘Determinants of Accounts Receivable:
Evidence from Equipment Manufacturing Industry in China’, An Online International
Research Journal, 2 (1), 470-476.
Shin, H.H. and Soenen, L. (1998), ‘Efficiency of working capital and corporate
profitability’, Financial Practice and Education, 8(2), 37–45.
Smith, J. K. (1987), ‘Trade credit and informational asymmetry’, Journal of
Finance, 42, 863–872.
The Finance Ministry (2009), Circular No. 228/2009 / TT-BTC guiding the setting
up and use of reserves for inventory price decrease, loss of financial investments,
receivable debts bad and warranty products, goods and construction works in
enterprises, issued on December 7, 2009.
Ukaegbu, B. (2014), ‘The significance of working capital management in
determining firm profitability: Evidence from developing economies in Africa’,
Research in International Business and Finance, 31, 1-16.
Vahid, T. K., Elham, G., Mohsen, A. K. and Mohammadreza, E. (2012), ‘Working
Capital Management and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Iranian Companies’,
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1313-1318.
Vaidya, R. R. (2011), ‘The Determinants of trade credit: Evidence from Indian
manufacturing firms’, Working Papers 2011-012, Indira Gandhi Institute of
Development Research, Mumbai, India.
662
Wang, Y. J. (2002), ‘Liquidity management, operating performance, and corporate
value: evidence from Japan and Taiwan’, Journal of Multinational Financial
Management, 12(2), 159-169.
Wilner, B. S. (2000), ‘The exploitation of relationship in financial distress: the case
of trade credit’, Journal of Finance, 55, 153–178.
Yazdanfar, D. (2013), ‘Profitability determinants among micro firms: evidence
from Swedish data’, International Journal of Managerial Finance, 9 (2), 150-160.
663
APPENDIX 1.
Table 2. Statistics describe the rate of customer receivables and business performance
Factors that affect
account receivables
Experimental results of previous studies
Expectations of
our research
Provision for doubtful
receivables (PROVI)
+/-
Revenue growth
(GROWTH)
(+) Emery (1984)
(+) Petersen and Rajan (1997)
(+) Niskanen and Niskanen (2006)
(-) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010)
(+) Vaidya (2011)
+/-
Size
(SIZE)
(+) Nadiri (1969)
(+) Petersen and Rajan (1997)
(+) Ng et al. (1999)
(+) Danielson et al. Scott (2004)
(+) Niskanen and Niskanen (2006)
(+) Bougheas et al. (2009)
(+) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010)
(+) Khan et al. (2012)
(+) Shi et al. (2016)
+
Years of Operation
(LAGE)
(+) Petersen and Rajan (1997)
(+) Niskanen and Niskanen (2006)
(+) Bougheas et al. (2009)
(Meaningless) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-
Solano (2010)
(+) Khan et al. (2012)
(+) Shi et al. (2016)
+
Short-term finance
(STLEV)
(+) Petersen and Rajan (1997)
(+) Niskanen and Niskanen (2006)
(+) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010)
(-) Vaidya (2011)
+/-
Financial cost
(FCOST)
(-) Petersen and Rajan (1997)
(-) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010)
-
664
Factors that affect
account receivables
Experimental results of previous studies
Expectations of
our research
Cash flow
(CFLOW)
(Meaningless) Niskanen and Niskanen (2006)
(+/-) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010)
+/-
Total assets turnover
(TURN)
(-) Long et al. (1993)
(+) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010)
+/-
Profits (GPROF)
(+) Emery (1984)
(+) Petersen and Rajan (1997)
(+) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010)
+
Inventory Ratio
(INVEN)
(-) Bougheas et al. (2009)
(-) Vaidya (2011)
-
Liquidity
(LIQ)
(-) Nadiri (1969)
(+) Ng et al. (1999)
(-) Bougheas et al. (2009)
(+)Vaidya (2011)
+/-
665
APPENDIX 2.
Table 3. Previous research on the impact of receivables on the value of the enterprise
and results of the study on the impact of receivables on performance
Independent variable Verification of
the fit of the
model
Dependent variable REC REC2 GROWTH SIZE LEV
Martínez-Sola
et al. (2012)
Enterprise
value
Tobin’s Q + - + Meaningless Meaningless
AR (2)> 0.1 and
Hansen test> 0.1
so the model is
fit
MBOOK + - + Meaningless +
AR (2) <0.1 and
Hansen test> 0.1
should have
autocorrelation
Expectations
of our
research
Business
performance
ROA + - + +/- -
AR(2) > 0.1 and
Hansen test >
0.1
ROE + - + +/- -
AR(2) > 0.1 and
Hansen test >
0.1
APPENDIX 3
Table 4. A composite of previous studies on the impact of changes in receivables on the
value of enterprises and results of the study on the impact of changes in receivables on
performance
Dependent variable
Independent variable Verification of the fit
of the model DEVIATION GROWTH SIZE LEV
Martínez-Sola et
al. (2012)
Tobin’s Q - + Meaningless +
AR (2)> 0.1 and
Hansen test> 0.1 so the
model is fit
MBOOK - + Meaningless +
AR (2) <0.1 and
Hansen test> 0.1
should have
autocorrelation
Expectations of
our research
ROA - + +/- -
AR(2) > 0.1 and
Hansen test > 0.1
ROE - + +/- -
AR(2) > 0.1 and
Hansen test > 0.1
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- factors_affect_account_receivable_management_and_its_impact.pdf