Factors affect account receivable management and its impact on business performance of Vietnamese enterprises

This paper analyzes factors that affect account receivables management and its impact on business

performance of enterprises in Vietnam through a sample of 326 non-financial companies. The

companies are listed on the Hanoi Stock Exchange (HNX) and the Hochiminh Stock Exchange (HOSE)

between 2013 and 2017. The research results show that the new variables introduced into the

model is the provision for bad debts which positively affects accounts receivables. As such, when

the provision for bad debts increases and the profit of the company is reduced, the company shall

intensify the implementation of the commercial credit policy, leading to the increase in both

receivables as well as revenue and profit. In addition, the research shows that there is an optimal

level of revenue for business performance. Specifically, if account receivables accounted for

24.98% of total assets, ROA reached the highest value and receivables accounted for 25.15% of

total assets, the ROE also reached the highest value.

pdf20 trang | Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Ngày: 24/05/2022 | Lượt xem: 278 | Lượt tải: 0download
Nội dung tài liệu Factors affect account receivable management and its impact on business performance of Vietnamese enterprises, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
ness, or the profitability of the asset and the return on equity are greatest. This contributes to the assumption that Lewellen et al. (1980), in the imperfect competition market, would incur expenses related to credit assessments and contingency expenses, thus creating a premise for commercial credit policy affecting the efficiency of business operations. Thus, granting commercial credit can bring benefits such as increased revenue, expanded market share, but at the same time cause losses to businesses such as increased financial costs and opportunity costs. customers do not pay or pay late. If these costs exceed the benefits, they will reduce the efficiency of business operation. Thus, we can 658 conclude in practice that the relationship between customer receivables and business performance is inverted-U, there is an optimal level of receivability at which efficiency. The activity of the business is the greatest. At the low level, when the efficiency of the business increase and the optimal receivables is reduced, the efficiency of the business will decrease. Moreover, the deviation from the optimal value reduces the efficiency of the business. Thus, the implication in our study for researchers and business managers is that managing commercial credit policies is critical to business operations in order to increase operational efficiency through the profitability of assets and profitability of equity. Businesses should strive to ensure the optimum level of customer acquisition to maximize business performance. For the Vietnamese market, the average customer receivable margin of the industry is about 25% of the total assets. However, the limitation of this study is the cases for each industry with different characteristics and for different sizes of enterprises (large enterprises, small and medium enterprises) different commercial applications. Therefore, it would be worthwhile to examine the factors that affect receivables and analyze whether there is a non-linear relationship between receivables and business performance among different occupations or types of enterprise sizes. 5. References Akinlo, O. O. (2011), ‘The effect of working capital on profitability of firms in Nigeria: Evidence from general method of moments (GMM)’, Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 1 (2), 130-135. Bagh, T., Nazir, M. I., Khan, M. A., Khan M. A., Razzaq, S. (2016), ‘The Impact of Working Capital Management on Firms Financial Performance: Evidence from Pakistan’, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 1097-1105. Bougheas, S., Mateut, S. and Mizen, P. (2009), ‘Corporate trade credit and inventories: new evidence of a trade-off from accounts payable and receivable’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 33 (2), 300-307. Cheng, N. S. and Pike, R. (2003), ‘The trade credit decision: evidence of UK firms’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 419–438. Claver, E., Molina, J. and Tari, J. (2002), ‘Firm and industry effects on firm profitability: a Spanish empirical analysis’, European Management Journal, 20 (3), 321-328. Danielson, M. G. and Scott, J.A. (2004), ‘Bank loan availability and trade credit demand’, The Financial Review, 39 (4), 579-600. Deloof, M. (2003), ‘Does Working Capital Management Affect Profitability of Belgian Firms?’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30 (3-4), 573-587. 659 Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Maksimovic, V. (2001), ‘Firms as Financial Intermediaries: Evidence From Trade Credit Data’, Working Paper 2696, World Bank Policy Research. Doğan, M. (2013), ‘Does Firm Size Affect The Firm Profitability? Evidence from Turkey’, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(4), 53-59. Emery, G. W. (1984), ‘A pure financial explanation for trade credit’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19, 271–285. Ferris, J. S. (1981), ‘A Transactions Theory of Trade Credit Use’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96 (2), 243–270. Fiegenbaum, A. and Karnani, A. (1991), ‘Output Flexibility – A Competitive Advantage for Small Firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 101-114. Forghani, M., Shirazipour, M., Hosseini, A. (2013), ‘Impact of working capital management on firms performance’, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3(7), 943-947. García-Teruel, P. J. and Martínez-Solano, P. (2007), ‘Short-term debt in Spanish SMEs’, International Small Business Journal, 25, 579–602. García-Teruel, P. J. and Martínez-Solano, P. (2010), ‘Determinants of trade credit: A comparative study of European SMEs’, International Small Business Journal, 28(3), 215–233. Geroski, P.A., Machin, S.J. and Walters, C.F. (1997), ‘Corporate growth and profitability’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 45 (2), 171-189. Gill, A., Biger, N. and Mathur. N (2010), ‘The Relationship Between Working Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States’, Business and Economics Journal, 2010,1-9. Goddard, J., Tavakoli, M. and Wilson, J. O. S. (2005), ‘Determinants of profitability in European manufacturing and services: evidence from a dynamic panel model’, Applied Financial Economics, 15, 1269-1282. Gul , S., Khan, M. B., Rehman, U. R., Khan, M. T, Khan, M. and Khan, W. (2013), ‘Working Capital Management and Performance of SME Sector’, European Journal of Business and Management, 5(1), 60-68. Hall, M. and Weiss, L. (1967), ‘Firm Size and Profitability’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49 (3), 319 – 331. Jensen, M.C. and Murphy, K.J. (1990), ‘Performance pay and top-management incentives’, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (1), 225-64. 660 Khan, M. A., Tragar, G. A. and Bhutto, N. A. (2012), ‘Determinants of Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable: A case of Pakistan Textile Sector, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 240-251. Kim, Y. H. and Atkins, J. C. (1978), ‘Evaluating investments in accounts receivable: a wealth maximising framework’, Journal of Finance, 33, 403–412. Lazaridis, I. and Tryfonidis, D. (2006), ‘The relationship between working capital management and profitability of listed companies in the Athens Stock Exchange’, Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, 19 (1), 1-12. Lee, J. (2009), ‘Does Size Matter in Firm Performance? Evidence from US Public Firms’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 16 (2), 189-203. Lewellen, W. G., McConnell, J. J. and Scott, J. A. (1980), ‘Capital market influences on trade credit policies’, Journal of Financial Research, 2, 105–113. Long, M. S., Malitz, I. B. and Ravid, S. A. (1993), ‘Trade credit, quality guarantees, and product marketability’, Financial Management, 22, 117–127. Makori, D. M. and Jagongo, A. (2013), ‘Working Capital Management and Firm Profitability : Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing and Construction Firms Listed on Nairobi S ecurities Exchange, Kenya’, International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 1 (1), 1-14. Mansoori, E. and Muhammad, D. (2012), ‘The Effect of Working Capital Management on Firm’s Profitability: Evidence from Singapore’, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, số 4(5), tr. 472-486. Martínez-Sola, C., García-Teruel, P. J. and Martínez-Solano, P. (2012), ‘Trade creditpolicy and firm value’, Accounting & Finance, 53, 791-808 Mian, S. and Smith, C. (1992), ‘Accounts receivables management policy: theory and evidence’, Journal of Finance, 47, 167–200. Nadiri, M. I. (1969), ‘The determinants of trade credit in the US total manufacturing sector’, Econometrica, 37 (3), 408-423. Ng, C. K., Smith, J. K. and Smith, R. L. (1999), ‘Evidence on the determinants of credit terms used in interfirm trade’, Journal of Finance, 54, 1109–1129. Niskanen, J. and Niskanen, M. (2006), ‘The determinants of corporate trade credit policies in a bank-dominated financial environment: the case of Finnish small firms’, European Financial Management, 12, 81–102. Padachi, K. (2006), ‘Trends in Working Capital Management and its Impact on Firms’Performance: An Analysis of Mauritian Small Manufacturing Firms’, International Review of Business Research Papers, 2 (2), 45-58. Petersen, M.A. and Rajan, R.G. (1997), ‘Trade credit: theory and evidence’, Society for Financial Studies, 10(3), 661-691. 661 Pi, L. and Timme, S. (1993), ‘Corporate control and bank efficiency’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 17 (2-3), 515-30. Pike, R., Cheng, N. S., Cravens, K. and Lamminmaki, D. (2005), ‘Trade credits terms: asymmetric information and price discrimination evidence from three continents’, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 32, 1197–1236. Samiloglu, F. and Demirgunes, K. (2008), ‘The effect of working capital management on firm profitability: evidence from Turkey’, The International Journal of Applied Economics and Finance, 2(1), 44-50. Schwartz, R. (1974), ‘An economic model of trade credit’, Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 9, 643–657. Serrasqueiro, Z.S. and Nunes, P.M. (2008), ‘Performance And Size: Empirical Evidence From Portuguese SMEs’, Small Business Economics, 31 (2), 195 – 217. Sharma, A.K., and Kumar, S. (2011), ‘Effect of working capital management on firm profitability: Empirical evidence from India’, Global Business Review, 12 (1), 159-173. Shepherd, W.G. (1972), ‘The Elements of Market Structure’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 54 (1), 25-37. Shi, Y., Zhu, C. and Yang, T. (2016), ‘Determinants of Accounts Receivable: Evidence from Equipment Manufacturing Industry in China’, An Online International Research Journal, 2 (1), 470-476. Shin, H.H. and Soenen, L. (1998), ‘Efficiency of working capital and corporate profitability’, Financial Practice and Education, 8(2), 37–45. Smith, J. K. (1987), ‘Trade credit and informational asymmetry’, Journal of Finance, 42, 863–872. The Finance Ministry (2009), Circular No. 228/2009 / TT-BTC guiding the setting up and use of reserves for inventory price decrease, loss of financial investments, receivable debts bad and warranty products, goods and construction works in enterprises, issued on December 7, 2009. Ukaegbu, B. (2014), ‘The significance of working capital management in determining firm profitability: Evidence from developing economies in Africa’, Research in International Business and Finance, 31, 1-16. Vahid, T. K., Elham, G., Mohsen, A. K. and Mohammadreza, E. (2012), ‘Working Capital Management and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Iranian Companies’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1313-1318. Vaidya, R. R. (2011), ‘The Determinants of trade credit: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms’, Working Papers 2011-012, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India. 662 Wang, Y. J. (2002), ‘Liquidity management, operating performance, and corporate value: evidence from Japan and Taiwan’, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 12(2), 159-169. Wilner, B. S. (2000), ‘The exploitation of relationship in financial distress: the case of trade credit’, Journal of Finance, 55, 153–178. Yazdanfar, D. (2013), ‘Profitability determinants among micro firms: evidence from Swedish data’, International Journal of Managerial Finance, 9 (2), 150-160. 663 APPENDIX 1. Table 2. Statistics describe the rate of customer receivables and business performance Factors that affect account receivables Experimental results of previous studies Expectations of our research Provision for doubtful receivables (PROVI) +/- Revenue growth (GROWTH) (+) Emery (1984) (+) Petersen and Rajan (1997) (+) Niskanen and Niskanen (2006) (-) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010) (+) Vaidya (2011) +/- Size (SIZE) (+) Nadiri (1969) (+) Petersen and Rajan (1997) (+) Ng et al. (1999) (+) Danielson et al. Scott (2004) (+) Niskanen and Niskanen (2006) (+) Bougheas et al. (2009) (+) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010) (+) Khan et al. (2012) (+) Shi et al. (2016) + Years of Operation (LAGE) (+) Petersen and Rajan (1997) (+) Niskanen and Niskanen (2006) (+) Bougheas et al. (2009) (Meaningless) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez- Solano (2010) (+) Khan et al. (2012) (+) Shi et al. (2016) + Short-term finance (STLEV) (+) Petersen and Rajan (1997) (+) Niskanen and Niskanen (2006) (+) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010) (-) Vaidya (2011) +/- Financial cost (FCOST) (-) Petersen and Rajan (1997) (-) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010) - 664 Factors that affect account receivables Experimental results of previous studies Expectations of our research Cash flow (CFLOW) (Meaningless) Niskanen and Niskanen (2006) (+/-) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010) +/- Total assets turnover (TURN) (-) Long et al. (1993) (+) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010) +/- Profits (GPROF) (+) Emery (1984) (+) Petersen and Rajan (1997) (+) Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano (2010) + Inventory Ratio (INVEN) (-) Bougheas et al. (2009) (-) Vaidya (2011) - Liquidity (LIQ) (-) Nadiri (1969) (+) Ng et al. (1999) (-) Bougheas et al. (2009) (+)Vaidya (2011) +/- 665 APPENDIX 2. Table 3. Previous research on the impact of receivables on the value of the enterprise and results of the study on the impact of receivables on performance Independent variable Verification of the fit of the model Dependent variable REC REC2 GROWTH SIZE LEV Martínez-Sola et al. (2012) Enterprise value Tobin’s Q + - + Meaningless Meaningless AR (2)> 0.1 and Hansen test> 0.1 so the model is fit MBOOK + - + Meaningless + AR (2) <0.1 and Hansen test> 0.1 should have autocorrelation Expectations of our research Business performance ROA + - + +/- - AR(2) > 0.1 and Hansen test > 0.1 ROE + - + +/- - AR(2) > 0.1 and Hansen test > 0.1 APPENDIX 3 Table 4. A composite of previous studies on the impact of changes in receivables on the value of enterprises and results of the study on the impact of changes in receivables on performance Dependent variable Independent variable Verification of the fit of the model DEVIATION GROWTH SIZE LEV Martínez-Sola et al. (2012) Tobin’s Q - + Meaningless + AR (2)> 0.1 and Hansen test> 0.1 so the model is fit MBOOK - + Meaningless + AR (2) <0.1 and Hansen test> 0.1 should have autocorrelation Expectations of our research ROA - + +/- - AR(2) > 0.1 and Hansen test > 0.1 ROE - + +/- - AR(2) > 0.1 and Hansen test > 0.1

Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:

  • pdffactors_affect_account_receivable_management_and_its_impact.pdf