Recently, environmental reporting has gradually been drawing great attention from both
academics and practitioners in the less-developed areas of the world. And requirement for
improvement of environmental performance has extended beyond the concerns of
environmental activists, media and other external stakeholders to become essential interest of
firms’ management who have been realizing the significance of environmental accounting and
reporting to sustainable growth of companies.
This work is about to provide various parties as policy makers and business managers with a
conceptual framework, as a foundation, that can help them in designing and implementing
accounting system(s) that can best report and disclose the environmentally-related information
within the corporate-wide reporting system.
13 trang |
Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Ngày: 24/05/2022 | Lượt xem: 298 | Lượt tải: 0
Nội dung tài liệu Environmental accounting and reporting a comprehensive review of general framework and application to Vietnam, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
would fail.
Environmental accounting should be dealt with as an integrated part of a broader corporate
accounting system in which conventional accounting is also a separate part.
Taking in to account those strengths and weaknesses of previous approaches, and
adopted approaches proposed by Bartolomeo et al. (2000), Burritt at el. (2004) suggested an
integrative framework for environmental accounting at firm level to incorporate
environmental information in company accounting/reporting system.
345
Fig. 6. Comprehensive Framework of Environmental Accounting
Source: Burritt at el. (2004)
In this comprehensive framework, two types of environmental impacts and their
measurement are reflected independently.
• Environmentally induced impacts on company’s economic situation are recorded
through monetary environmental accounting systems, using monetary measures such as cost
of site restoration, environmental fees in compliance with laws, value of environmental
assets and liabilities. Monetary environmental accounting is considered as the broaden in the
contents of conventional accounting as they are based on existing methods of conventional
accounting.
• Company’s impacts on environment are reported through physical environmental
accounting systems, using physical measures, for example, amounts of material or energy measured
in physical units like tons, cubic meters. And this is an addition to conventional accounting.
This framework of environmental accounting inherits advantages of early models
because it makes clear distinction between two types of environmentally related impacts –
the central concern of any environmental reporting system. As these two types of
information – physical and monetary environmental information – are developed from
different data sources, measured in different metric units and serve different purposes of
various stakeholders.
Within this framework it is also possible to make further division into sub-systems
by adding other dimensions (such as time frame, user focus, etc.) to address detailed
information needs of different groups of users without breaching the balance and
completeness of the whole system.
5. Conclusion
Though Vietnamese government has taken initial steps to promote its application to
business, current practice of environmental accounting in companies is still weak. Efforts
346
made by the government and professionals are just enough to raise awareness among
academics and practitioners of the importance and implications of environmental accounting
practice at corporate level and are not sufficient to make it realized.
Despite the desire by various stakeholders, management are still lingering in
implementing environmental accounting in their businesses. Obviously, it is challenging to
push a new concept into practice without practical guidance. This fact calls for the need for
thorough fundamental studies that can help developing a comprehensive framework of
environmental accounting that is applicable at corporate level.
6. References
Bartolomeo, M., Bennett, M., Bouma, J., Heydkamp, J., James, P. & Wolters, T.
(2000), ‘Environmental management accounting in Europe: current practice and future
potential’, The European Accounting Review, 9(1), 31-52.
Beams, F.A. and Fertig, P.E. (1971), ‘Pollution control through social costs
conversion’, Journal of Accountancy, 141, 37-42.
Bennett, M. & James, P. (1998), The Green Bottom Line: Environmental Accounting
for Management, Sheffield, Greenleaf Publishing.
Bennett, M. & James, P. (2017), ‘The Green Bottom Line’ in The Green Bottom Line:
Environmental Accounting for Management-Current Practice and Future Trends, Bennett,
M. & James, P. (eds), Routledge, New York, USA.
Burritt, R., Hahn, T. & Schaltegger, S. (2004), ‘An Integrative Framework of
Environmental Management Accounting–Consolidating the Different Approaches of EMA
into a Common Framework and Terminology’, in Environmental management accounting:
informational and institutional developments, Bennett, M., Bouma, J. & Wolters, T. (eds),
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Burritt, R., Hahn, T. & Schaltegger, S. (2002), ‘Towards A Comprehensive Framework
for Environmental Management Accounting – Links Between Business Actors and Environmental
Management Accounting Tools’, Australian Accounting Review, 12(2), 39-50.
Churchman, C.W. (1971), ‘On the facility, felicity, and morality of measuring social
change’, Accounting Review, 46 (1), 30-35.
Dilley, S.C. & Weygandt, J.J. (1973), ‘Measuring social responsibility: an empirical
test’, Journal of Accountancy, 143, 62-70.
Doan, A. P. N & Tran, B. T. T. (2017), ‘Reality and Factors Affecting the Disclosure
of Social Responsibility Information of Listed Enterprises in Vietnam Securities Market’.
Proceedings: Research and Training Accounting and Auditing of Vietnamese Universities
according to international standards, National Economics University Publisher, Vietnam.
Environmental Protection Agency. (1995), An Introduction to Environmental
Accounting: Key Concepts and Terms, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
347
Estes, R.W. (1973), “Accounting for social costs”, in Accounting and Society, Estes,
R.W. (ed.), Melville, Los Angeles, USA.
Government. (2015), Decree No. 19/2015/ND-CP detailing a number of articles of
the Law on Environmental Protection, on April 1, 2015, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Gray, R. (1992), ‘Accounting and Environmentalism: An Exploration of The
Challenge of Gently Accounting for Accountability, Transparency and Sustainability’,
Accounting, Organization and Society, 17(5), 399-425.
Gray, R. (1993), ‘Current Practice in Environmental Reporting’, Social and
Environmental Accounting, 13(1), 6-9.
Gray, R., Bebbington, J., Walters, D. (1993), Accounting for The Environment, 1st
edition, Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd, London.
Gray, R., Bebbington, J. (2001), Accounting for The Environment, 2nd edition, SAGE
Publications Ltd.
Hecht, J. E. (2007), ‘National Environmental Accounting: A Practical Introduction’,
International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 1, 3-66.
Herzig, C., Viere, T., Schaltegger, S. & Burritt, R. (2012), Environmental
Management Accounting: Case Studies of South-East Asian Companies, Routledge, New
York, USA.
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (1998), Environmental
Management in Organizations: The Role of Management Accounting, Financial and
Management Accounting Committee, IFAC, New York, USA.
Linowes, D.F. (1972), ‘Socio-economic accounting’, Journal of Accountancy, 133, 37-42.
Mathews, M. R. (1997), ‘Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting
research: Is there a silver jubilee to celebrate?’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Journal, 10(4), 481-531.
Mathews, M. R. (2000), The Development of Social and Environmental Accounting
Research 1995-2000, Working and Discussion Paper, retrieved on August 16th, 2018, from
.
Maunders, K. & Burritt, R. (1991), ‘Accounting and Ecological Crisis’, Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4(3), 9-26.
Ministry of Finance. (2015), Circular No.155/2015/TT-BTC on Guidelines for
Information Disclosure on Securities Market, on October 6, 2015, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Ministry of the Environment. (2005), Environmental Accounting Guidelines,
Ministry of the Environment, Japan.
Mobley, S.C. (1970), ‘The challenges of socio-economic accounting’, The
Accounting Review, 45 (4), 762-768.
348
National Assembly. (2014), Law No. 55/2014/QH13 on Environmental Protection,
on June 23, 2014, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nguyen, L.S, Tran, D. M., Nguyen, H. T. X & Le, H. Q. (2017), ‘Factors Affecting
Disclosure Levels of Environmental Accounting Information: The Case of Vietnam’,
Accounting and Finance Research, 6(4), 255-264.
Nguyen, L. H., Nguyen, T. H., Nguyen, T. H. & Pham, P. L. (2017), Determining
Environmental costs in Vietnamese Enterprises-Case Study of Viglacera Halong Joint Stock
Company, South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 13(3).
Pigou, R. C. (1920), The Economics of Welfare, Macmillan and Co., Limited,
London, UK.
Schaltegger, S. & Burritt, R. (2000), Contemporary Environmental Accounting:
Issues, Concepts and Practice, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK.
Schaltegger, S., Müller, K. & Hindrichsen, H. (1996), Corporate Environmental
Accounting, Chichester: Wiley
Ullmann, A. (1976), ‘The corporate environmental accounting system: A
management tool for fighting environmental degradation’, Accounting, Organizations and
Society, 1(1), 71-79.
United Nations. (1993), Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated
Environmental and Economic Accounting, United Nations Division for Sustainable
Development, United Nations.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- environmental_accounting_and_reporting_a_comprehensive_revie.pdf