The author examines how the impact of adjusting the financial asset value at the end of the period
on the balance sheet affects the dividend policy of the firms. The research hypothesis is that the fair
value adjustment of financial assets has a positive effect on business results and the board of directors
sees good business results normally giving high dividends. However, the survey of 287 firms listed on
the Hochiminh City Stock Exchange has the opposite result, there is a negative relationship between
the adjustment of financial asset value and the change of dividend policy. Author's research indicates
that the dividend policy is in line with the downward trend if the firms carries out more than the
adjustment of financial asset value. The author will clarify in the paper.
12 trang |
Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Ngày: 24/05/2022 | Lượt xem: 478 | Lượt tải: 0
Nội dung tài liệu Do fair value adjustments influence dividend policy among listed firms in Hochiminh Stock Exchange?, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
0 + + α3 x3 + α4 x4 + α5 x5 + α6 x6 + α7 x7 + ε (3)
In equation (3), additional variables include:
x4: Profit after tax in year t-1 before adjustment of change in financial asset value.
x5: Profit after tax of year t before adjustment of change in financial asset value.
x6: total assets in year t
x7: money and cash equivalents of year t (code 110 on the Balance Sheet made on
31/12 / t, according to The Curcular No. 200/2014 / TT-BTC dated 22/12/2014 of the
Minister of Finance)
Variables are divided by the total assets of the enterprise by year.
The results show the correlation between the change in dividend policy and the
adjusted level of financial assets as shown in Table 6.
3. Results and Discussion
To find the correlation between the adjustment of financial asset value and dividend policy
of the business, the author studied the audited financial statements of 287 enterprises listed on the
Stock Exchange Ho Chi Minh City in the areas of business in the period 2015-2017
The author selected enterprises listed on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange to
investigate, get the research writing data because statistics show that this is the floor of many
typical businesses, large scale, many sectors The market capitalization ratio is higher than
the HNX, while the liquidity of the companies is higher.
The author analyzes a sample of 287 public companies listed on the Ho Chi Minh
City Stock Exchange in the period 2015-2017. Data obtained from the website of Ho Chi
Minh City Stock Exchange and websites of listed companies.
Data collected by the author using statistical software SPSS Statitics 17 analysis,
evaluation find the relationship between the variables.
Table 4 is a statistical report describing the dependent and independent variables
examined by the author to determine the relationship with the dividend policy.
Table 4: Statistical Report
Variables Mean Median Maximum Minimum Std Deviation
Δy 0.00485 0 0.00502 -0.00001 0.03369
x1 0.06021 0.03491 0.11132 0.00158 0.18026
x2 0.03747 0.02590 0.08613 0.00065 0.18962
x3 0.00790 0.00047 0.00722 0 0.02397
Survey data of 287 enterprises listed on Hochiminh Stock Exchange in the period
2015-2017 show that enterprises have average change in dividend policy, Last year was
VND 4 850 per 1,000,000 VND of total assets. Of which the highest change was in
VND5020 per 1 000 000 assets, the lowest change was 10 VND per 1 000 000 VND.
75
Results of data analysis according to equation (1) (2) we have:
Table 5: Correlation regression results
Variables (1) (2)
Constant 0.044
(7.40)***
0.044
(7.42)***
NIBREV t-1 0.228
(2.81)***
0.428
(2.81)***
REV t-1 0.448
(0.84)
N
Adj.R2
287
0.2
287
0.2
Looking at Table 5, there is an intimate relationship between the after-tax profit of
the year and the business results of the previous year (excluding the adjustment of the
financial asset value) and the adjustment of the asset value last year's finance.
Dependent variable is NIt: Profit after tax of year t.
Independence variable is NIBREV t-1 as the t-1 business result before taking into
account the value of financial assets. This variable is calculated by the EIT of year t-1 plus
(minus) the adjusted total financial assets at the year-end t-1.
The independent variable REV t-1 is the sum of the difference in the value of financial
assets at the end of year t-1.
Table 6: Factors influencing the dividend policy
Variables (1) (2) (3)
Constant 0.008
(5.75)***
0.008
(5.76)***
x1 0.010
(2.26)***
x2 0.070
(2.09)**
x3 -0.464
(2.97)***
-0.464
(2.97)***
-0.464
(2.97)***
x4 0.010
(2.25)**
0.010
(2.25)**
x5 0.070
(2.09)**
0.070
(2.09)**
x6 0.001
(4.33)***
x7 0.004
(0.55)
N
Adj.R2
287
0.11
287
0.11
287
0.12
76
Looking at the data in Table 6, we find that the relationship between y and x3 is
reversed - 0.464. So there is a negative relationship between the increase in the value of
financial assets and the change in dividend policy. Thus the H2 hypothesis is rejected, there
is a negative relationship between the adjustment of the financial asset value and the change
in dividend policy. The effect of adjusting the financial asset value is negative and
statistically significant.
4. Conclusions and Policy Implications
Research results show that the dividend policy change is influenced by three factors
in the model (1):
Group of factors: Business results.
Last year's business results impacted the same relationship with 0.01; The business
performance factor of the company this year affects the same direction, proportional to the
coefficient 0.07.
Thus, the H1 hypothesis is accepted. The policy of dividends depends on the business
results of the whole year before and this year, in which business results this year have a
greater impact on dividend policy.
Group factors: Adjustment of financial asset value.
The factor of financial asset value was negatively impacted, at the rate of -0.464
Thus the H2 hypothesis is rejected. There is no positive relationship between the
increase in the value of financial assets and dividend policy.
On the other hand, when enterprises increase the adjustment of financial asset value
through provisioning, they tend to be cautious and keep the same dividend policy as the
previous year.
This research indicates that if the enterprise has many reserves and adjusted the amount
and value of financial assets, dividend policy tends to remain stable as last year. Increase
dividend payout this year. This is also a useful information for investors on the stock market.
However, if the dividend yield is lower than market expectation, it may lead to
negative signals on the stock market (Brav et al., 2005) and may damage the reputation
of the company and its markets. financial school (Gomes, 1996). There is also the view
that companies use adjusted financial asset values as an excuse to reduce dividends
(Uspensky, 2008).
Edwards and Mayer (1985) found that managers of the UK's largest companies
reduced their dividends as they faced a continuous decline in earnings, suggesting that
temporary regulators Business results are not included in distribution of dividends.
From the study results on the author suggested to stock investors as follows:
Signs of reducing the dividend policy: On the balance sheet there is an increase of the
index: Provision for short-term investment (code 129); Short-term bad debt reserve (code
77
139); Long-term bad debt reserve (code 219); Provision for long-term financial investment
(code 259).
5. References
Rarth, M.E. (2006) ‘International Financial reporting Standard: pros and cons for
investor’. Accounting and Business Rerearch, 36(special issue).
Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H and Landsman, W.R.(2001). ‘The relevance of the value
relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view’. Journal of
Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3).
Beatty, A. (2007) ‘How does changing measurement change management behaviour ?
A review of the evidence ’. Accounting and Business Research, 37 (Special issue)
Brav, A., Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R. and Michaely, R. (2005). ‘Payout policy in the
21st century’. Journal of Fanancial Economics, 77(3).
Cornett, M.M., Rezaee, Z. and Terhranian, H. (1996). ‘An investigation of capital
market reactions to pronouncements on fair value accounting’. Journal of Accounting and
Economics, 22(1-3).
Gomes, A.(1996). ‘Dynamics of stock prices, manager ownership and private benefit
of control’. Manuscript, Havard University.
Hitz, J-M (2007). ‘The decision usefulness of fair value accounting- a theoretical
perspective’. European Accounting Review, 16(2).
Hung, M. and Subramannyam, K.R. (2007). ‘Financial statement effects of
adopting international accounting standards: the case of Germany’. Review of Accounting
Studies, 12(4)
Igor, G. (2010) ‘Do fair value adjustments influence dividend policy’.
Jagannathan, M., Stephens, C.P and Weisbach, M.S (2000). ‘Financial flexibility and the
choice between dividends and stock repurchases’. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(3).
Lintner, J. (1956) ‘Distribution of income of corporations among dividents, retained
earnings and taxes’. American Economic Review, 46(2): 97-113
Penman, S. (2007) ‘Financial reporting quality: is fair value a plus or minus ?’.
Accounting and business Research. 38 (special issue).
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- do_fair_value_adjustments_influence_dividend_policy_among_li.pdf