Using panel data of 34 microfinance institutions in period of 5 years (2011-2015), this study is aimed
to investigate the determinants of the Operational Self-Sustainability (OSS) of Vietnamese
microfinance institutions. The main findings are: (i) Microfinance institutions’ OSS in Vietnam are
mainly determined by 5 following factors: Portfolio at Risk (PAR>30), Capital structure, Gross Loan
Portfolio, Scope of activities of MFIs and Legal Form of MFIs; (ii) Among these factors, OSS are most
affected by: legal status (social organizations have better OSS than formal MFIs or
programs/projects), location (MFIs focus in one province have higher OSS than working nationwide
or just in one district), Capital Structure (MFIs with more equity proportion have higher OSS); (iii)
Surprisingly, average loan size per borrower and Age of MFIs do not have statistically significant
correlation with Operational- Self Sustainability. Therefore, to be more sustainable, MFIs should
focus on its professionality and increase its equity. Other recommendations are proposed to
related stakeholders for the enabling ecosystem for microfinance development - one important
tool in poverty reduction and economic development.
17 trang |
Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Ngày: 24/05/2022 | Lượt xem: 261 | Lượt tải: 0
Nội dung tài liệu Determinants of operational self-sustainability of microfinance institutions in Vietnam, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
ing liquidity management, credit management, credit risk management,
operational risk management, financial management, capital adequacy ratio management...
in order to decrease portfolio risks, ensuring that MFIs can operate safely and sustainably.
This is also the solid foundation for MFIs to reduce the costs, increase revenues, build strong
reputation for attracting savers, investors and donors.
- Expanding the customer base extensively and intensively by diversifying financial
products provision, such as lending (flexible durations and payment periods according to
clients’ cash flow, risk-based interest rate decisions for clients), microinsurance, remittance,
savings (various term savings, savings for different purposes such as education, emergency,
healthcare, installment savings). The application of soft selling and upselling techniques
should be applied, in parallel to non-financial products such as financial literacy, financial
advices, etc are helpful for keeping microfinance existing clients and attract the new ones.
This approach is also essential for ensuring no “mission drift” of MFIs in its
commercialization and development.
677
- Develop the clear strategy for the scope of operations in accordance with the size
and capability of MFIs development. If MFIs restrict scope of operations within few products
or few operational areas, they will limit the ability to reach customers and increase market
share; thus, affecting the sustainability of the organization. However, if MFIs extend their
operation too fast, it will reduce the sustainability due to the increase of management and
operation cost, while facing difficulties in competions of expanding market shares with other
stronger financial providers such as commercial banks, people’s credit funds, other MFIs,
and private money lenders.
- MFIs operating in the form of Programs/Project of MFIs should be converted into
social funds, as this is currently the highest sustainable model. Social funds need to choose
appropriate time to officially transfer to MFI after the legislation on microfinance activities
be modified and improved. At the same time, social funds should also develop a plan and
prepare carefully in all aspects such as personnel, finance before officially transforming to
MFI. This will help MFIs to become actively and overcome the difficulties and challenges
when initially formalized to stand strong and grow.
To policy makers (State Bank of Vietnam, Ministry of Finance and related
government agencies)
The development of MFIs depends very much on the legal framework,
particularly the regulations directly related to MFIs. The transformation of MFIs into
formal microfinance institutions is a right policy to guide these organizations operate
in a professional manner. Based on the experience from other countries, after the
conversion, most MFIs will have larger operational scale and be more efficient.
However, in this research, licensed MFIs have lower level of operational self -
sustainability than social funds (semi-official MFIs). It means that the current
regulations are still costly to licensed MFIs, as they have to adapt various prudential
requirements for safety, and system transformation cost of changes. Therefore, the
regulations specifically for MFIs should pay more attention to its characteristics and
development purposes, encouraging the faster formalization process for the whole
microfinance sector and financial inclusion.
2. References
Asian Development Bank (2016), ‘Việt Nam tăng tốc phát triển khu vực tài chính vi
mô hướng tới tài chính toàn diện’, Báo cáo nội bộ của ADB cho Ngân hàng Nhà nước Việt
Nam, Hà Nội.
Asian Development Bank, Finance for the Poor: ADB Microfinance Strategy, access
on July 3 2013, from .
Ayayi, A.G. and Sene, M. (2010), ‘What drives microfinance institution’s financial
sustainability’, The Journal of Developing Areas, 44(1), pp. 303-324.
678
Bogan, V. (2012), ‘Capital structure and sustainability: an empirical study of
microfinance institutions’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 94 (4), pp. 1045-1058.
Bogan, V.L. (2008), Microfinance institutions: does capital structure matter?,
Retrieved on Jan 20th 2017, from .
Borjesson, J. & Hulten, A. (2016), ‘Determinants of Profitability in Microfinance
Institutions in Sub-saharan Africa’, Bachelor Thesis, School of Business, Economics and
Law, University of Gothenburg.
Chowdhury, A. (2009), ‘Microfinance as a Poverty Reduction Tool – A Critical
Assessment’, UN-DESA Working Paper, 89, retrieved on September 15th 2015, from
.
Christen, R.P., Rhyne, E. and Vogel, R.C. (1995), ‘Maximizing the outreach of
microenterprise finance: an analysis of successful microfinance programs’, U.S. Agency For
International Development, USAID.
Coleman, K.A. (2007), ‘The impact of capital structure on the performance of
microfinance institutions’, The Journal of Risk Finance, 8(1), pp. 56-71.
Crombrugghe, A., Tenikue, M. & Sureda, J. (2008), ‘Performance analysis for a
sample of microfinance institutions in India’, Annals of Public and Cooperative
Economics, 79(2), pp. 269-299.
Cull, R., Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Morduch, J. (2007), ‘Financial Performance and
Outreach: A Global Analysis of Leading Micro Banks’, Economic Journal, 117, pp. 107–33.
Cull. R, Asli Demirguc - Kunt and J. Morduchs (2007), ‘Financial Performance and
Outreach: A Global Analysis of Leading Microbanks’, The Economic Journal, 117, pp. 107 -133.
Duflos, E. (2013), ‘Microcredit Interest Rates’, MFWG’s Bulletin, 19, pp. 20-23.
Hartarska, V. and Nadolnyak, D. (2010), ‘Do regulated microfinance institutions
achieve better sustainability and outreach? Cross-country evidence’, Applied Economics, 39
(10), pp.1207-1222.
Hội Phụ nữ (2015). Báo cáo khảo sát hoạt động của các TCTCVM, quỹ xã hội,
CT/DA TCVM thuộc HLHPN Việt Nam, Hà Nội.
Imboden K (2005). ‘Building Inclusive Financial Sectors: The Road to Growth and
Poverty’, Journal of International Affairs, 58 (2), pp. 65-86.
Jensen, M.K. (2003), ‘On Alternative Theories of Savings’, Journal of Economic
Literature 34, pp. 647-661
Kinde, B. (2012), ‘Financial sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in
Ethiopia’, European Journal of Business and Management, 4(15), pp. 1-11.
Ledgerwood, J. (1999), ‘Microfinance Handbook on Sustainable Banking with the
Poor: An Institutional and Financial Perspective.’ The World Bank Working Paper:
Washington. D.C.
679
Ledgerwood, J. (ed.) (2001), Cẩm nang hoạt động tài chính vi mô nhìn từ giác độ tài
chính và thể chế, NXB thống kê, Hà nội.
Ledgerwood, J. (ed.) (2013), The New Microfinance Handbook, A Financial Market
System Perspective, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Mahajan, V. and Nagasri, G. (1999), ‘Building sustainable microfinance institutions
in India’, retrieved on February 28th 2014, from www.sa-
dhan.net/Adls/Microfinance/PerspectiveMicrofinance/BuildingSustainableMFIs.pdf.
Mahapatra, M. S. and Dutta, S. (2016), ‘Determinants of Sustainability of
Microfinance Sector in India’, Journal of Rural Development, Vol. 35 No. (3) pp. 507-522.
Meyer, R.L. (2002), ‘Track Record of financial institutions in assisting the poor in
Asia’, ADB Institute Research Paper No. 49, pp. 1-42.
Mix market (2016), vietnam market overview , retrieved on August 9th 2016, from
.
Morduch & Aghion (2005), The Economics of Microfinance, retrieved on May 15th
2017, from
<
Microfinance.pdf>.
Morduch J. and Haley B. (1999), ‘Analysis of the Effects of Microfinance on Poverty
Reduction’, NYU Wagner Working Paper No. 1014, June 1999.
Nadiya Marakkath (2014), Sustainability of Indian Microfinance Institutions, ISBN 978-
81-322-1628-5 ISBN 978-81-322-1629-2 (eBook), DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-1629-2.
Ngân hàng Thế giới (2012 & 2014), Đo lường Tài chính toàn diện: Cơ sở dữ liệu
toàn cầu Findex, retrieved on july, 10th 2015, from
Nguyễn Kim Anh, Lê Thanh Tâm. (2013). Mức độ bền vững của các tổ chức tài chính vi
mô tại Việt Nam: thực trạng và một số khuyến nghị, NXB Giao thông vận tải, Hà Nội.
Nhóm công tác tài chính vi mô (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016), Danh bạ tổ chức tài
chính vi mô Việt Nam, Hà Nội.
Nyamsogoro, G.D. (2010), ‘Financial Sustainability of Rural Microfinance
Institutions (MFIs) in Tanzania’, PhD thesis, University of Greenwich.
Osotimehin, K.O., Jegede, Charles.A, I, Akinlabi, Babatunde Hamed (2011),
‘Determinants of Microfinance Outreach In SouthWestern Nigeria: An Empirical
Analysis’, International Journal of Management and Business Studies Vol. 1(1), pp. 001-
007, December 2011.
Quách Mạnh Hào (2005), ‘Access to Finance and Poverty Reduction: An Application
to Rural Vietnam’, Ph.D thesis, University of Birmingham.
680
Rosenberg, R. (2007), ‘CGAP Reactions on the Compartamos Initial Public
Offering: A Case Study on Microfinance Interest Rates and Profits’, CGAP Focus Note 42.
Samuelson P.A & Nordhaus, W.D. (1996). Economics. 14th Edition. McGraw-Hill,
Inc.: New York.
TCTCVM CEF (2016), Báo cáo tài chính của tổ chức giai đoạn (2010 – 2015), Hà Nội.
TCTCVM Thanh Hóa (2016), Báo cáo tài chính của tổ chức giai đoạn (2010 – 2015),
Hà Nội.
TCTCVM TYM (2016), Báo cáo tài chính của tổ chức giai đoạn (2010 – 2015), Hà Nội.
Venkatraman, S. and RajSekhar, T. (2008), ‘For India’s microfinance institutions,
governance is the key to sustained and scalable growth CRISIL’, retrieved on December 25th
2010, from .
Woller, G. and Schreiner, M. (2001), ‘Poverty Lending Financial Self-sufficiency and the
Six Aspects of Outreach’, SEEP Working Group Paper, New York, NY.
681
APPENDICES
Appendix 1: List of Vietnam’s Microfinance Institutions in the research
MFI name Symbol name
1 Fund for poor self-employed workers CEP
2 Tinh thuong One Member Limited Liability Company TYM
3 M7 Microfinance Institution M7MFI
4 Thanh Hoa Microfinance Institution Thanh Hoa MFI
5 Women Development Fund of Dien Bien district FWD
6 Women Development Fund of Dien Bien Phu city DBP CITY
7 Microfinance Department - World Vision Vietnam WV Vietnam
8 Tien Giang Provincial Women's Economic Development Assistance Fund MOM
9 Fund for poor employees in Ba Ria - Vung Tau province CAFPE BR-VT
10 Golden Hand Program BTV
11 Ho Chi Minh Women Supporting Economic Development Fund CWED
12 Anh Chi Em Program ACE
13 Center for Development for the Poor Ha Tinh PPC
14 Small Business Development Center SEDA
15 Ninh Phuoc Women Development Support Fund
16 Hue Heart Foundation H4H
17 Microfinance fund for community development MFCDI
18 Credit savings program - Women's Union, Phu Yen District, Son La
19 Center for Women and Community Development CWCD
20 Standard training STU
21 An Phu Development Fund AN PHU
22 Fund for supporting women in Bac Kan province BKF
23 Fund for supporting women in Lao Cai province
24 Fund for supporting women in economic development of Ben Tre province BTWU
25 Fund for opportunity for women to work in Daknong province DNOWEOF
26 Soc Son Fund for the poor women PNN
27 CSOD
28 Childfund Hoa Binh
29 Dariu
30 Small Credit Fund For Housing Refurbishment, Da Nang
31 Soc Trang Fund for Poor Women
32 VietED Microfinace Institution VietED MF
33 Women Development Fund, Quang Binh
34 Ho Chi Minh City Women Union
HCMC
WOMEN
UNION
682
Appendix 2: Results of statistical tests of the Model
VIF test result
Hettest result
Mean VIF 2.07
lnalspb 1.18 0.850496
lnear1 1.23 0.814826
lnpar1 1.26 0.796620
loc2 1.44 0.693361
lnage 1.60 0.625941
loc1 2.30 0.435014
lnglp 2.75 0.364116
legaf2 3.30 0.303123
legaf1 3.55 0.281796
Variable VIF 1/VIF
. vif
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
chi2(1) = 248.50
Variables: fitted values of lnoss
Ho: Constant variance
Breusch-Pagan / Cook-Weisberg test for heteroskedasticity
. hettest
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- determinants_of_operational_self_sustainability_of_microfina.pdf