Determinants of operational self-sustainability of microfinance institutions in Vietnam

Using panel data of 34 microfinance institutions in period of 5 years (2011-2015), this study is aimed

to investigate the determinants of the Operational Self-Sustainability (OSS) of Vietnamese

microfinance institutions. The main findings are: (i) Microfinance institutions’ OSS in Vietnam are

mainly determined by 5 following factors: Portfolio at Risk (PAR>30), Capital structure, Gross Loan

Portfolio, Scope of activities of MFIs and Legal Form of MFIs; (ii) Among these factors, OSS are most

affected by: legal status (social organizations have better OSS than formal MFIs or

programs/projects), location (MFIs focus in one province have higher OSS than working nationwide

or just in one district), Capital Structure (MFIs with more equity proportion have higher OSS); (iii)

Surprisingly, average loan size per borrower and Age of MFIs do not have statistically significant

correlation with Operational- Self Sustainability. Therefore, to be more sustainable, MFIs should

focus on its professionality and increase its equity. Other recommendations are proposed to

related stakeholders for the enabling ecosystem for microfinance development - one important

tool in poverty reduction and economic development.

pdf17 trang | Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Ngày: 24/05/2022 | Lượt xem: 261 | Lượt tải: 0download
Nội dung tài liệu Determinants of operational self-sustainability of microfinance institutions in Vietnam, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
ing liquidity management, credit management, credit risk management, operational risk management, financial management, capital adequacy ratio management... in order to decrease portfolio risks, ensuring that MFIs can operate safely and sustainably. This is also the solid foundation for MFIs to reduce the costs, increase revenues, build strong reputation for attracting savers, investors and donors. - Expanding the customer base extensively and intensively by diversifying financial products provision, such as lending (flexible durations and payment periods according to clients’ cash flow, risk-based interest rate decisions for clients), microinsurance, remittance, savings (various term savings, savings for different purposes such as education, emergency, healthcare, installment savings). The application of soft selling and upselling techniques should be applied, in parallel to non-financial products such as financial literacy, financial advices, etc are helpful for keeping microfinance existing clients and attract the new ones. This approach is also essential for ensuring no “mission drift” of MFIs in its commercialization and development. 677 - Develop the clear strategy for the scope of operations in accordance with the size and capability of MFIs development. If MFIs restrict scope of operations within few products or few operational areas, they will limit the ability to reach customers and increase market share; thus, affecting the sustainability of the organization. However, if MFIs extend their operation too fast, it will reduce the sustainability due to the increase of management and operation cost, while facing difficulties in competions of expanding market shares with other stronger financial providers such as commercial banks, people’s credit funds, other MFIs, and private money lenders. - MFIs operating in the form of Programs/Project of MFIs should be converted into social funds, as this is currently the highest sustainable model. Social funds need to choose appropriate time to officially transfer to MFI after the legislation on microfinance activities be modified and improved. At the same time, social funds should also develop a plan and prepare carefully in all aspects such as personnel, finance before officially transforming to MFI. This will help MFIs to become actively and overcome the difficulties and challenges when initially formalized to stand strong and grow. To policy makers (State Bank of Vietnam, Ministry of Finance and related government agencies) The development of MFIs depends very much on the legal framework, particularly the regulations directly related to MFIs. The transformation of MFIs into formal microfinance institutions is a right policy to guide these organizations operate in a professional manner. Based on the experience from other countries, after the conversion, most MFIs will have larger operational scale and be more efficient. However, in this research, licensed MFIs have lower level of operational self - sustainability than social funds (semi-official MFIs). It means that the current regulations are still costly to licensed MFIs, as they have to adapt various prudential requirements for safety, and system transformation cost of changes. Therefore, the regulations specifically for MFIs should pay more attention to its characteristics and development purposes, encouraging the faster formalization process for the whole microfinance sector and financial inclusion. 2. References Asian Development Bank (2016), ‘Việt Nam tăng tốc phát triển khu vực tài chính vi mô hướng tới tài chính toàn diện’, Báo cáo nội bộ của ADB cho Ngân hàng Nhà nước Việt Nam, Hà Nội. Asian Development Bank, Finance for the Poor: ADB Microfinance Strategy, access on July 3 2013, from . Ayayi, A.G. and Sene, M. (2010), ‘What drives microfinance institution’s financial sustainability’, The Journal of Developing Areas, 44(1), pp. 303-324. 678 Bogan, V. (2012), ‘Capital structure and sustainability: an empirical study of microfinance institutions’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 94 (4), pp. 1045-1058. Bogan, V.L. (2008), Microfinance institutions: does capital structure matter?, Retrieved on Jan 20th 2017, from . Borjesson, J. & Hulten, A. (2016), ‘Determinants of Profitability in Microfinance Institutions in Sub-saharan Africa’, Bachelor Thesis, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg. Chowdhury, A. (2009), ‘Microfinance as a Poverty Reduction Tool – A Critical Assessment’, UN-DESA Working Paper, 89, retrieved on September 15th 2015, from . Christen, R.P., Rhyne, E. and Vogel, R.C. (1995), ‘Maximizing the outreach of microenterprise finance: an analysis of successful microfinance programs’, U.S. Agency For International Development, USAID. Coleman, K.A. (2007), ‘The impact of capital structure on the performance of microfinance institutions’, The Journal of Risk Finance, 8(1), pp. 56-71. Crombrugghe, A., Tenikue, M. & Sureda, J. (2008), ‘Performance analysis for a sample of microfinance institutions in India’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 79(2), pp. 269-299. Cull, R., Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Morduch, J. (2007), ‘Financial Performance and Outreach: A Global Analysis of Leading Micro Banks’, Economic Journal, 117, pp. 107–33. Cull. R, Asli Demirguc - Kunt and J. Morduchs (2007), ‘Financial Performance and Outreach: A Global Analysis of Leading Microbanks’, The Economic Journal, 117, pp. 107 -133. Duflos, E. (2013), ‘Microcredit Interest Rates’, MFWG’s Bulletin, 19, pp. 20-23. Hartarska, V. and Nadolnyak, D. (2010), ‘Do regulated microfinance institutions achieve better sustainability and outreach? Cross-country evidence’, Applied Economics, 39 (10), pp.1207-1222. Hội Phụ nữ (2015). Báo cáo khảo sát hoạt động của các TCTCVM, quỹ xã hội, CT/DA TCVM thuộc HLHPN Việt Nam, Hà Nội. Imboden K (2005). ‘Building Inclusive Financial Sectors: The Road to Growth and Poverty’, Journal of International Affairs, 58 (2), pp. 65-86. Jensen, M.K. (2003), ‘On Alternative Theories of Savings’, Journal of Economic Literature 34, pp. 647-661 Kinde, B. (2012), ‘Financial sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Ethiopia’, European Journal of Business and Management, 4(15), pp. 1-11. Ledgerwood, J. (1999), ‘Microfinance Handbook on Sustainable Banking with the Poor: An Institutional and Financial Perspective.’ The World Bank Working Paper: Washington. D.C. 679 Ledgerwood, J. (ed.) (2001), Cẩm nang hoạt động tài chính vi mô nhìn từ giác độ tài chính và thể chế, NXB thống kê, Hà nội. Ledgerwood, J. (ed.) (2013), The New Microfinance Handbook, A Financial Market System Perspective, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. Mahajan, V. and Nagasri, G. (1999), ‘Building sustainable microfinance institutions in India’, retrieved on February 28th 2014, from www.sa- dhan.net/Adls/Microfinance/PerspectiveMicrofinance/BuildingSustainableMFIs.pdf. Mahapatra, M. S. and Dutta, S. (2016), ‘Determinants of Sustainability of Microfinance Sector in India’, Journal of Rural Development, Vol. 35 No. (3) pp. 507-522. Meyer, R.L. (2002), ‘Track Record of financial institutions in assisting the poor in Asia’, ADB Institute Research Paper No. 49, pp. 1-42. Mix market (2016), vietnam market overview , retrieved on August 9th 2016, from . Morduch & Aghion (2005), The Economics of Microfinance, retrieved on May 15th 2017, from < Microfinance.pdf>. Morduch J. and Haley B. (1999), ‘Analysis of the Effects of Microfinance on Poverty Reduction’, NYU Wagner Working Paper No. 1014, June 1999. Nadiya Marakkath (2014), Sustainability of Indian Microfinance Institutions, ISBN 978- 81-322-1628-5 ISBN 978-81-322-1629-2 (eBook), DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-1629-2. Ngân hàng Thế giới (2012 & 2014), Đo lường Tài chính toàn diện: Cơ sở dữ liệu toàn cầu Findex, retrieved on july, 10th 2015, from Nguyễn Kim Anh, Lê Thanh Tâm. (2013). Mức độ bền vững của các tổ chức tài chính vi mô tại Việt Nam: thực trạng và một số khuyến nghị, NXB Giao thông vận tải, Hà Nội. Nhóm công tác tài chính vi mô (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016), Danh bạ tổ chức tài chính vi mô Việt Nam, Hà Nội. Nyamsogoro, G.D. (2010), ‘Financial Sustainability of Rural Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) in Tanzania’, PhD thesis, University of Greenwich. Osotimehin, K.O., Jegede, Charles.A, I, Akinlabi, Babatunde Hamed (2011), ‘Determinants of Microfinance Outreach In SouthWestern Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis’, International Journal of Management and Business Studies Vol. 1(1), pp. 001- 007, December 2011. Quách Mạnh Hào (2005), ‘Access to Finance and Poverty Reduction: An Application to Rural Vietnam’, Ph.D thesis, University of Birmingham. 680 Rosenberg, R. (2007), ‘CGAP Reactions on the Compartamos Initial Public Offering: A Case Study on Microfinance Interest Rates and Profits’, CGAP Focus Note 42. Samuelson P.A & Nordhaus, W.D. (1996). Economics. 14th Edition. McGraw-Hill, Inc.: New York. TCTCVM CEF (2016), Báo cáo tài chính của tổ chức giai đoạn (2010 – 2015), Hà Nội. TCTCVM Thanh Hóa (2016), Báo cáo tài chính của tổ chức giai đoạn (2010 – 2015), Hà Nội. TCTCVM TYM (2016), Báo cáo tài chính của tổ chức giai đoạn (2010 – 2015), Hà Nội. Venkatraman, S. and RajSekhar, T. (2008), ‘For India’s microfinance institutions, governance is the key to sustained and scalable growth CRISIL’, retrieved on December 25th 2010, from . Woller, G. and Schreiner, M. (2001), ‘Poverty Lending Financial Self-sufficiency and the Six Aspects of Outreach’, SEEP Working Group Paper, New York, NY. 681 APPENDICES Appendix 1: List of Vietnam’s Microfinance Institutions in the research MFI name Symbol name 1 Fund for poor self-employed workers CEP 2 Tinh thuong One Member Limited Liability Company TYM 3 M7 Microfinance Institution M7MFI 4 Thanh Hoa Microfinance Institution Thanh Hoa MFI 5 Women Development Fund of Dien Bien district FWD 6 Women Development Fund of Dien Bien Phu city DBP CITY 7 Microfinance Department - World Vision Vietnam WV Vietnam 8 Tien Giang Provincial Women's Economic Development Assistance Fund MOM 9 Fund for poor employees in Ba Ria - Vung Tau province CAFPE BR-VT 10 Golden Hand Program BTV 11 Ho Chi Minh Women Supporting Economic Development Fund CWED 12 Anh Chi Em Program ACE 13 Center for Development for the Poor Ha Tinh PPC 14 Small Business Development Center SEDA 15 Ninh Phuoc Women Development Support Fund 16 Hue Heart Foundation H4H 17 Microfinance fund for community development MFCDI 18 Credit savings program - Women's Union, Phu Yen District, Son La 19 Center for Women and Community Development CWCD 20 Standard training STU 21 An Phu Development Fund AN PHU 22 Fund for supporting women in Bac Kan province BKF 23 Fund for supporting women in Lao Cai province 24 Fund for supporting women in economic development of Ben Tre province BTWU 25 Fund for opportunity for women to work in Daknong province DNOWEOF 26 Soc Son Fund for the poor women PNN 27 CSOD 28 Childfund Hoa Binh 29 Dariu 30 Small Credit Fund For Housing Refurbishment, Da Nang 31 Soc Trang Fund for Poor Women 32 VietED Microfinace Institution VietED MF 33 Women Development Fund, Quang Binh 34 Ho Chi Minh City Women Union HCMC WOMEN UNION 682 Appendix 2: Results of statistical tests of the Model VIF test result Hettest result Mean VIF 2.07 lnalspb 1.18 0.850496 lnear1 1.23 0.814826 lnpar1 1.26 0.796620 loc2 1.44 0.693361 lnage 1.60 0.625941 loc1 2.30 0.435014 lnglp 2.75 0.364116 legaf2 3.30 0.303123 legaf1 3.55 0.281796 Variable VIF 1/VIF . vif Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 chi2(1) = 248.50 Variables: fitted values of lnoss Ho: Constant variance Breusch-Pagan / Cook-Weisberg test for heteroskedasticity . hettest

Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:

  • pdfdeterminants_of_operational_self_sustainability_of_microfina.pdf
Tài liệu liên quan