Economists and policy makers in Vietnam have been discussing about the possibility of using devaluation
to encourage exports and improve the balance of payments (BOP), while maintaining macroeconomic
stability. The empirical results of this paper show that there has been two-way causality between money
supply growth and inflation, exchange rate and inflation, and money supply growth and exchange rate in
Vietnam in the 1990s. Both the long run and short run results of this paper suggest that devaluation can be
implemented to encourage exports and to improve current account balance and BOP, and also to reduce the real exchange rate appreciation in the short run.
10 trang |
Chia sẻ: Thục Anh | Ngày: 09/05/2022 | Lượt xem: 355 | Lượt tải: 0
Nội dung tài liệu Can devaluation be effective in improving the balance of payments in Vietnam?, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
eciation (LR tests are significant at the 10% level in all models).
LR tests also reject the hypothesis of deletion of constant or error correction terms (ECT) in these
models.
In sum, the growth rates of money supply affect future inflation and exchange rate depreci-
ation, while exchange rate depreciation does not influence the future money supply growth and
inflation. In addition, inflation also influences the exchange rate depreciation and then reveals the
possibility of adjusting money growth rates by the SBV to stabilise the economy. The interre-
lationship between these variables can be seen more accurately through forecast error variance
decomposition, which is explained in the following section.
474 N.N. Thanh, K. Kalirajan / Journal of Policy Modeling 28 (2006) 467–476
Table 4
The variance decomposition of inflation rate (D ln CPI)
Time horizon (quarter) 20 Observations from 1993Q4 to 1998Q3; proportion
of forecast variance explained by changes in
D ln CPI D ln E D ln MS
Model (1) (CPI, VCBE, M1)
1 72.18 0.37 27.45
3 70.99 0.41 28.60
6 70.71 0.41 28.88
9 70.71 0.41 28.88
12 70.71 0.41 28.88
Model (2) (CPI, VCBE, M2)
1 81.40 3.83 14.77
3 81.02 3.86 15.12
6 80.98 3.87 15.15
9 80.98 3.87 15.15
12 80.98 3.87 15.15
Model (3) (CPI, HNE, M1)
1 73.59 2.59 23.82
3 71.52 3.68 24.80
6 71.35 3.72 24.93
9 71.35 3.72 24.93
12 71.35 3.72 24.93
Model (4) (CPI, HNE, M2)
1 83.66 5.28 11.06
3 81.99 6.07 11.94
6 81.96 6.08 11.96
9 81.96 6.08 11.96
12 81.96 6.08 11.96
Source: authors’ estimates by using Microfit 4.0.
4.3. Forecast error variance decomposition
Before analysing variance decompositions, it is necessary to confirm whether the combination
of variables in the VECM is linear or non-linear, in order to choose the orthogonal or general case
of variance decompositions. The covariance matrices of errors from all VECM models in the short
run are considered diagonal matrices since their covariances are very small and approaching zero.
This suggests that combinations of variables in these models are linear. Therefore, the orthogonal
case for variance decompositions is applied in this study.
In this section, the forecast error variances of each variable are decomposed into the proportion
attributable to each of the random shocks. The results of forecast error variances of inflation are
reported in Table 4. Money supply growth is the most important source of variability for inflation.
The shocks of M1 growth contribute a substantial change from around 23% to 28% of inflation
variations (models (1) and (3)), the contributions of M1 growth to inflation variation are larger than
for the case of M2 (from around 12% to 15%) in models (2) and (4). In contrast, depreciation of
exchange rate accounts for only around 0.4–3.9% of the forecast error variance of inflation in the
case of Vietcombank exchange rates and from around 2.6% to 6.0% for the case of Hanoi parallel
market rates (models (3) and (4)). This means that the shocks of exchange rate depreciation affect
the variation of inflation only a little. These results are consistent with the Granger causality tests
in Table 3.
N.N. Thanh, K. Kalirajan / Journal of Policy Modeling 28 (2006) 467–476 475
So through variance decompositions, money growth is determined as a major source of variation
for inflation, while exchange rate depreciation has contributed only a little for variation in inflation.
Thus, the empirical results of this paper show that there has been two-way causality between money
supply growth and inflation, exchange rate and inflation, and money supply growth and exchange
rate in Vietnam in the 1990s.
5. Conclusions and policy implications
Both the long run and short run results of this paper suggest that devaluation can be implemented
to encourage exports and to improve current account balance and BOP, and also to reduce the real
exchange rate appreciation in the short run. Because, this study has shown that the depreciations
have a small effect on stimulating inflation in the short run (assuming money supply growth is
constant) and that they also have positive effects on encouraging exports (although exchange
rate’s effects on exports in the long run are larger than that in the short run) and limiting imports.
In addition, regional and multiple trade agreements between Vietnam and other countries require
the reductions in tariffs and other barriers to foreign trade. Therefore, Vietnam has to rely on the
flexible exchange rate policy to encourage exports and BOP rather than using tariffs and exports
price policy.
However, this study also shows that while money growth rates are the most important source
to generate inflation in both short and long runs, exchange rates depreciations do have a strong
effect to stimulate inflation in the long run. The potential of high inflation is possible if the SBV
implements an easy monetary policy. Therefore, it is necessary to coordinate closely between
monetary and exchange rate policies to perform successfully the devaluation of the domestic
currency. The effective controls of money supply are the most important measure to control
inflation and this must be put as the first priority of the SBV.
The policy suggestions to control the money supply effectively are as follows. Controlling
money supply in the face of large capital inflows is not an easy job for the SBV. The large cap-
ital inflows will cause an increase in domestic inflation (more currencies to buy few goods) and
real exchange rate appreciation (excess supply for foreign currencies). To sterilise these conse-
quences of large capital flows, indirect monetary instruments such as the open market operations
(OMO), refinancing, reserve requirements (RRs), foreign exchange swaps, and variable deposit
requirements need to be implemented effectively.
The foreign exchange swaps, and variable deposit requirements are effective tools in terms
of sterilising capital flows that have been successfully implemented in Indonesia and Spain.
Especially, through foreign exchange swaps, the central bank can make an agreement to sell
foreign exchange against the domestic currency and simultaneously to buy it at a specific date
in the future. The foreign exchange is bought by banks and may be invested abroad or is lent
to domestic residents, but its effects are to reduce the domestic currency base (at a given money
multiplier, money supply will be reduced). With foreign exchange swaps, the central banks are
highly flexible at times to buy and sell foreign exchange (Lee, 1997). Foreign exchange swaps have
been implemented in Vietnam since 1998, but they are still little used. Although this instrument
still has disadvantages,1 with the development of the financial sector and experience gained by the
1 This instrument may cause losses for the central bank if the difference between the spot rate and forward rate is smaller
than the interest rate differential between the foreign and domestic markets; this also contains the foreign exchange risk
when the central bank converts foreign currency into local currency (Lee, 1997).
476 N.N. Thanh, K. Kalirajan / Journal of Policy Modeling 28 (2006) 467–476
SBV during the banking and financial reform, this instrument could be increasingly introduced
in the near future.
Other macroeconomic policies such as fiscal policy, reform of State-Owned Enterprises
(SOEs), and external economic relation policies need to be considered when implementing the
devaluation policy in order to stimulate exports and to improve BOP, but inflation still must be
controlled and macroeconomic stability maintained.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the anonymous referees of this journal and Professor Antonio Maria
Costa for valuable suggestions on an earlier version of this paper.
References
Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (1995). Real and nominal effective exchange rates for 22 LDCs: 1971:1–1990:4. Applied Eco-
nomics, 27(7), 591–604.
Deravi, K., Gregorowicz, P., & Hegji, C. E. (1995). Exchange rate and the inflation rate. Quarterly Journal of Business
and Economics, 34(1), 42–54.
Dodsworth, J. R., Chopra, A., Pham, C. D., & ShiShido, H. (1996). Macroeconomic Experiences of the Transition
Economies in Indochina, Working Paper, September 19. Central Asia Department, International Monetary Fund.
Edwards, S. (1989). Real Exchange Rates, Devaluation, and Adjustment: Exchange Rate Policy in Developing Countries.
Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press.
Eltis, W. A., & Sinclair, P. J. N. (Eds.). (1981). The Money Supply and the Exchange Rate. New York: Oxford Clarendon
Press.
Enders, W. (1995). Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Kahn, G. A. (1987). Dollar Depreciation and Inflation, November. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic
Review.
Lee, J. Y. (1997). Sterilising capital inflows. In Economic Issues No. 7. Washington, DC: International Monetray Fund.
Lutkepohl, H. (1993). Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis (2nd ed.). Berlin/New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ngo, H. D. (1997). Dollarization in Vietnam and its Economic Implications, PhD Thesis, May. Canberra: National Centre
for Development Studies, The Australian National University.
Nguyen, N. T. (2001). The Reforms of Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies in Vietnam During the 1990s, PhD Thesis.
Canberra: National Centre for Development Studies, The Australian National University.
Pesaran, M. H., & Pesaran, B. (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0—Interactive Econometric Analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford
University Press.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- can_devaluation_be_effective_in_improving_the_balance_of_pay.pdf