Bài giảng Quản trị kinh doanh - Chapter six: Corporate - Level strategy: Creating value through diversification

How managers can create value through diversification initiatives

The reasons for the failure of many diversification efforts

How corporations can use related diversification to achieve synergistic benefits through economies of scope and market power

How corporations can use unrelated diversification to attain synergistic benefits through corporate restructuring, parenting, and portfolio analysis

The various means of engaging in diversification—mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures/strategic alliances, and internal development

Managerial behaviors that can erode the creation of value

 

ppt9 trang | Chia sẻ: hongha80 | Lượt xem: 594 | Lượt tải: 0download
Nội dung tài liệu Bài giảng Quản trị kinh doanh - Chapter six: Corporate - Level strategy: Creating value through diversification, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Chapter SixCorporate-Level Strategy: Creating Value through DiversificationAfter studying this chapter, you should have a good understanding of:How managers can create value through diversification initiativesThe reasons for the failure of many diversification effortsHow corporations can use related diversification to achieve synergistic benefits through economies of scope and market powerHow corporations can use unrelated diversification to attain synergistic benefits through corporate restructuring, parenting, and portfolio analysisThe various means of engaging in diversification—mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures/strategic alliances, and internal developmentManagerial behaviors that can erode the creation of valueLearning ObjectivesTRANSPARENCY-51 The summaries of the studies below consistently support the notion that attaining the intended payoffs from diversification efforts are very elusive:Michael Porter of Harvard University studied the diversification records of 33 large, prestigious U.S. companies over the 1950-1986 period and found that most of them have divested many more acquisitions than they had kept. The corporate strategies of most companies had dissipated rather than enhanced shareholder value—by taking over companies and breaking them up, corporate raiders had thrived on failed corporate strategies.Another study evaluated the stock market reaction to 600 acquisitions over a period between 1975 and 1991. The results indicate that acquiring firms suffered an average 4 percent drop in market value (after adjusting for market movements) in the three months following the acquisition announcement.Diversification and Corporate Performance: A Disappointing HistoryExhibit 6.1Sources: Lipin, S. & Deogun, N. 2000. Big merges of the 90’s prove disappointing to shareholders. Wall Street Journal, October 30: C1; A study by Dr. G. William Schwert, University of Rochester, cited in Pare, T. P. 1994. The new merger boom. Fortune, November 28:96; and Porter, M.E. 1987. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(3):43.A study conducted jointly by Business Week and Mercer Management Consulting, Inc., analyzed 150 acquisitions worth more than $500 million that took place between July 1990 and July 1995. Based on total stock returns from three months before the announcement and up to three years after the announcement: 30 percent substantially eroded shareholder returns. 20 percent eroded some returns. 33 percent created only marginal returns. 17 percent created substantial returns.A study by Salomon Smith Barney of U.S. companies acquired since 1997 in deals for $15 billion or more, the stocks of the acquiring firms have, on average, under-performed the S&P stock index by 14 percentage points and under-performed their peer group by four percentage points after the deals were announced.TRANSPARENCY-52Creating Value through Related and Unrelated DiversificationRelated Diversification: Economies of Scope Leveraging Core Competences3M leverages its competences in adhesives technologies to many industries, including automotive, construction, and telecommunications Sharing ActivitiesMcKesson, a large distribution company, sells many product lines such as pharmaceuticals and liquor through its super warehousesRelated Diversification: Market Power Pooled Negotiating PowerThe Times Mirror Company increases its power over customers by providing “one-stop shopping” for advertisers to reach customers through multiple media—television and newspapers—in several huge markets such as New York and Chicago Vertical IntegrationShaw Industries—a giant carpet manufacturer—increases its control over raw materials by producing much of its own polypropylene fiber, a key input to its manufacturing processExhibit 6.2Unrelated Diversification: Parenting, Restructuring, and Financial Synergies Corporate Restructuring and ParentingThe corporate office of Cooper Industries adds value to its acquired businesses by performing such activities as auditing their manufacturing operations, improving their accounting activities, and centralizing union negotiations Portfolio AnalysisNovartis, formerly Ciba-Geigy, uses portfolio analysis to improve many key activities, including resource allocation as well as reward and evaluation systems.TRANSPARENCY-53Simplified Stages of Vertical Integration: Shaw IndustriesExhibit 6.3Raw Materials Manufacturing of final product DistributionPolypropylene Fiber ProductionCarpet ManufacturingRetail StoresBackward IntegrationForward IntegrationTRANSPARENCY-54Benefits and Risks of Vertical IntegrationBenefitsSecure a source of raw materials or distribution channelsProtection and control over valuable assetsAccess to new business opportunitiesSimplified procurement and administrative proceduresRisksCosts and expenses associated with increased overhead and capital expendituresLoss of flexibility resulting from large investmentsProblems associated with unbalanced capacities along the value chainAdditional administrative costs associated with managing a more complex set of activitiesExhibit 6.4TRANSPARENCY-55The BCG Portfolio MatrixNotes:1. Each circle represents one of the corporation’s business units. The size of the circle represents the relative size of the business unit in terms of revenues.2. Relative market share is plotted as a logarithmic scale to be consistent with experience curve effects. This is very similar to learning curves and central to the BCG growth share matrix.3. Relative market share is measured by the ratio of the business unit’s size to that of its largest competitor.Exhibit 6.5 0.1X0.5X0.4X0.3X 0.2X2X1.5X1X10X4X18%16%10%022%2%4%6%8%20%14%12%Business Growth RateStarsCash CowsDogsQuestion MarksRelative Market ShareTRANSPARENCY-56The top ten mergersBelow are the world’s biggest mergers. Listed are the partners, each deal’s status or date of completion, and values in billions.1. Vodafone AirTouch PLC-Mannesmann AGApril 12, 2000 $1612. Pfizer Inc.-Warner-Lambert Co.June 19, 2000 $1163. America Online-Time WarnerJanuary 11, 2001 $1114. Exxon Corp.-Mobil Corp.Nov. 30, 1999 $815. (tie) Glaxo Wellcome PLC-SmithKline Beecham PLCDecember 27, 2000 $725. (tie) SBC Communications Inc.-AmeritechOct. 8, 1999 $727. Vodafone Group PLC-Airtouch Communications Inc.June 30, 1999 $698. Bell Atlantic Corp.-GTE Corp. (now Verizon)May 30, 2000 $609. Total Fina-Elf Aquitaine (now Total Fina Elf S.A.)Feb. 9, 2000 $5410. Viacom Inc.-CBS Corp.May 4, 2000 $50Sources: Thomson Financial Securities Data; AP Wire ReportsPartnersDateValue ($ billions)Exhibit 6.6TRANSPARENCY-57The Seven Habits of a Less-Than-Effective MergerHABIT #1 Be proactive: “Act or be acted upon.”REALITY Company was slow to see the potential of electronic planning devices which initially cut into product sales.HABIT #2 Begin with the end in mind: “You carefully think through the product or the service that you want to provide in terms of your market target, then you organize all the elements . . . to meet that objective.”REALITY The company delayed selling off noncore assets, such as a commercial printing business, which occupied management time and cut into profit margins. Now it’s being sold off.HABIT #3 Put first things first: “Organize and execute around priorities.”REALITY After the 1997 merger between Covey’s company and Franklin Resources, management didn’t trim overlapping jobs—thus increasing overhead and hurting margins.Exhibit 6.7HABIT #4 Think win/win: “There’s plenty for everybody . . . . One person’s success is not achieved at the expense or the exclusion of the success of others.”REALITY The two sales staffs were combined, but initially the compensation systems were not. That caused resentment among those who made less.HABIT #5 Seek first to understand, then to be understood: “An effective salesperson first seeks to understand the needs, the concerns, the situation of the customer.”REALITY Most sales staff was kept at Utah headquarters, so the company was unable to assess changing client needs out in the field.HABIT #6 Synergize: “We create new alternatives—something that wasn’t there before.”REALITY The combined company maintained two headquarters, limiting opportunities to build on each other’s strengths.HABIT #7 Sharpen the saw: “Preserv[e] and enhanc[e] the greatest asset that you have—you . . . . Renew the four dimensions of your nature—physical, spiritual, mental, and social/emotional.”REALITY Company was true to this principle by giving workers Sundays off. But that meant closing its 127 stores on a busy shopping day.Source: Grover, R. 1999. Gurus who failed their own course. Business Week, November 8, 125-126.TRANSPARENCY-58

Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:

  • pptchap006_5006.ppt
Tài liệu liên quan